Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Restenosis and occlusion remain important after aortoiliac stenting, and device choice does not fully explain late patency loss. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is implicated in atherosclerotic progression and residual vascular risk. Objective: To determine whether baseline Lp(a) is associated with long-term restenosis or occlusion after aortoiliac stenting. Methods: This post hoc biomarker analysis of COBEST included 125 patients and 168 treated iliac arteries randomised to the Advanta V12 covered stent (Atrium Medical Corporation, Hudson, NH, USA) or bare-metal stents for symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease. The primary outcome was loss of primary patency, defined as restenosis or occlusion during 5-year follow-up. Cox proportional hazards modelling and cumulative failure curves were the main analyses. Results: In the Lp(a)-adjusted Cox model, covered stent use was associated with a lower hazard of restenosis or occlusion (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31–0.97; p = 0.039), whereas each 1 mg/dL higher Lp(a) concentration was associated with a higher hazard (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06–1.10; p < 0.001; equivalent to HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.79–2.59 per 10 mg/dL increase). In the biomarker-adjusted model, each 1 mg/dL higher Lp(a) concentration (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02–1.08; p < 0.001; HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.22–2.16 per 10 mg/dL increase) and each 1 mmol/L higher triglyceride concentration (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.34–2.68; p < 0.001) remained associated with restenosis or occlusion. Conclusions: Elevated Lp(a) and, to a lesser extent, triglycerides were independently associated with long-term aortoiliac stent failure after adjustment for stent type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mwipatayi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: