Recent microcredit field experiments document low microcredit uptake and heterogeneous treatment effects. We posit the risk preference of households as a possible explanation. In a randomized field experiment in Bangladesh, we find that, in response to a microcredit intervention, household risk preference is significantly associated with microcredit uptake and its outcomes. Households with a more risk-seeking attitude are more likely to take microcredit, rent more land under fixed-rental contracts than share-cropping, adopt more technology, and expand businesses; these responses are accompanied by higher total income. In contrast, risk-averse households did not show such gains. Our results suggest that risk preference is an important dimension of heterogeneity in microcredit uptake and responses to the intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hossain et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: