This paper presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the price elasticity of charitable giving under both rebate and matching schemes. We compile 137 elasticity estimates from 26 experimental papers and synthesize them using random-effects and multilevel models. Charitable giving is highly price-responsive: the pooled meta-analytic mean elasticity of total donations is −1.75, indicating that lowering the effective price of giving substantially increases charitable revenue. Although we observe considerable between-study heterogeneity and some evidence of publication bias, bias-adjusted estimates remain negative. Furthermore, elasticity is substantially more negative under matching (−2.44) than under rebate (−0.73), contradicting the theoretical prediction of equivalence but aligning with the original experimental findings in this literature. The rebate-matching difference is attenuated when moving from laboratory to field settings, although it persists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clochard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: