Key result
Higher fractal dimension on Holter linked to ~25% lower arrhythmic death risk per SD post-MI.
Why the study?
Nonlinear dynamic methods such as fractal dimension to describe clustering of ventricular premature complexes have not been tested as predictors of arrhythmic death in postinfarction patients.
Does fractal dimension (D) on entry Holter recording predict future arrhythmic death in postinfarction patients?
Case-Control (n=484)
Blinded
Does fractal dimension (D) on entry Holter recording predict future arrhythmic death in postinfarction patients?
A high resolution fractal dimension of ventricular premature complexes on ambulatory Holter monitoring is an independent predictor of arrhythmic death in postinfarction patients.
May refine post-MI arrhythmic risk assessment; leaves open incremental value and prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to test fractal dimension (D), a measure of clustering of ventricular premature complexes (VPCs), on entry Holter recording as a predictor of future arrhythmic death and other-cause mortality in postinfarction patients in the Cardiac Arrhythmic Suppression Trial (CAST). BACKGROUND: Nonlinear dynamic methods of signal processing are being applied in medicine to provide new insights into apparently "chaotic" biologic events, including cardiac arrhythmias. One such application is the derivation of a fractal D to describe the clustering of VPCs in time. METHODS: Baseline Holter recordings were analyzed in blinded manner for 484 patients: 237 died or had a resuscitated cardiac arrest during follow-up, and 247 matched patients had no events. Fractal D, measured in four ways, was assessed as a predictor using Cox regression. RESULTS: One measure of D (high resolution D) was a significant univariate (relative hazard ratio 0.79 per SD change, p = 0.011) and multivariate (hazard ratio 0.75, p = 0.046) predictor of arrhythmic death but not other death (univariate p = 0.95, relative hazard 0.95, p = 0.66). Fractal D was greater (VPCs less clustered) in those patients free of arrhythmic events. On subgroup analysis, the predictive value of D resided in the randomized patient group (i.e., those who showed VPC suppression during initial antiarrhythmic drug titration and were randomized to blinded therapy with active drug or placebo) (multivariate hazard ratio 0.57, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A high resolution fractal D was predictive of arrhythmic (but not nonarrhythmic) death in a large postinfarction cohort. Further study of this new signal processing approach to ambulatory electrocardiographic recording will be of interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (1997) conducted a case-control in Myocardial Infarction (n=484). High resolution fractal dimension (D) vs. Per standard deviation change was evaluated on Arrhythmic death (HR 0.75, p=0.046). High resolution fractal dimension on entry Holter recording was a significant predictor of future arrhythmic death in postinfarction patients (HR 0.75 per SD change; P=0.046).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: