Key result
Ultrasonic strain measurements identify acute myocardial ischemia with up to ~95% sensitivity.
Why the study?
The accuracy of ultrasonic strain for detecting acute myocardial ischemia has been validated in animal experiments but not investigated clinically.
Can ultrasonic strain measurements accurately identify acutely ischemic myocardium in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty?
Observational (n=93)
Can ultrasonic strain measurements accurately identify acutely ischemic myocardium in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty?
p-value: p=<0.001
Ultrasonic strain indices accurately detect acute myocardial ischemia during coronary occlusion, suggesting a promising approach for the bedside monitoring of ischemic changes in regional function.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to investigate whether the changes in myocardial deformation measured with ultrasonic strain could accurately identify acutely ischemic myocardium during coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Early identification of acute myocardial ischemia has important clinical implications. The accuracy of ultrasonic strain for the detection of acute myocardial ischemia has been validated in animal experiments but has not been investigated in the clinical setting. METHODS: In 73 patients (64 +/- 12 years), either radial or longitudinal strain values were monitored in the "at-risk" segments before, during, and early after right, circumflex, and left anterior descending coronary angioplasty. Based on the visual wall motion assessed before the angioplasty, segments were divided into normokinetic (group I) and hypo/akinetic (group II). Strain data in the "at-risk " segments were compared with values derived from the adjacent nonischemic segments and normal values in 20 controls. RESULTS: Coronary occlusion induced a marked reduction in the systolic strain both in the radial (from 49 +/- 6.9% to 23 +/- 4.6% in group I and from 21.9 +/- 11% to 11.3 +/- 8.4% in group II, p < 0.001) and longitudinal directions. Concomitantly, postsystolic strain increased (from 3.8 +/- 3.1% to 14.6 +/- 9.5% in group I, and from 4.4 +/- 3.7% to 11.3 +/- 7.8% in group II in radial direction, p < 0.001). Upon reperfusion, all deformation parameters returned to near preocclusion values. In comparison with control, baseline, and reperfusion data, the systolic and postsystolic strain parameters measured during total coronary occlusion identified acutely ischemic myocardium with a sensitivity of 86% to 95% and a specificity of 83% to 89%. CONCLUSIONS: In this model of acute ischemia, ultrasonic strain indexes differentiate acutely ischemic segments from both normal and dysfunctional myocardium. This should be a promising new approach to the bedside monitoring of acute ischemic changes in regional myocardial function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kukulski et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial ischemia (n=93). Ultrasonic strain measurements vs. Adjacent nonischemic segments and normal controls was evaluated on Identification of acutely ischemic myocardium (p=<0.001). Systolic and postsystolic ultrasonic strain measurements during coronary occlusion identified acutely ischemic myocardium with 86% to 95% sensitivity and 83% to 89% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: