Why the study?
Circulating biomarkers can facilitate diagnosis and risk stratification for heart failure, but newer molecular platforms require significant resources for data and sample acquisition.
Do the novel circulating biomarkers angiopoietin-2 and thrombospondin-2 improve the diagnosis of acute heart failure and the prediction of incident heart failure?
Cohort (n=1,315)
Yes
Do the novel circulating biomarkers angiopoietin-2 and thrombospondin-2 improve the diagnosis of acute heart failure and the prediction of incident heart failure?
Odds Ratio: 1.36 (95% CI 1.09–1.69)
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The fact that a 96-patient cohort could, using this array, identify 2 robust and replicable markers is impressive and supports the validity of the approach.”
An automated strategy integrating EHR phenotyping and discarded plasma biobanking successfully identified angiopoietin-2 and thrombospondin-2 as robust biomarkers for acute and incident heart failure.
Background: Circulating biomarkers can facilitate diagnosis and risk stratification for complex conditions such as heart failure (HF). Newer molecular platforms can accelerate biomarker discovery, but they require significant resources for data and sample acquisition. Objectives: To test a pragmatic biomarker discovery strategy integrating automated clinical biobanking with proteomics. Methods: Using the EHR, we identified patients with and without HF, retrieved their discarded plasma samples, and screened these specimens using a DNA aptamer-based proteomic platform (1,129 proteins). Candidate biomarkers were validated in three different prospective cohorts. Results: In an automated manner, plasma samples from 1,315 patients (31% with HF) were collected. Proteomic analysis of a 96-patient subset identified nine candidate biomarkers (p <4.42 × 10−5). Two proteins, angiopoietin-2 and thrombospondin-2, were associated with HF in three separate validation cohorts. In an emergency department-based registry of 852 dyspneic patients, the 2 biomarkers improved discrimination of acute HF compared with a clinical score (p <0.0001) or clinical score plus B-type natriuretic peptide (p=0.02). In a community-based cohort (n = 768), both biomarkers predicted incident HF independent of traditional risk factors and NTproBNP (HR per SD increment, 1.35 [95%CI, 1.14 to 1.61, p = 0.0007] for angiopoietin-2, and 1.37 [1.06–1.79, p = 0.02] for thrombospondin-2). Among 30 advanced HF patients, concentrations of both biomarkers declined (80–84%) following cardiac transplant (p <0.001 for both). Conclusions: A novel strategy integrating EHRs, discarded clinical specimens, and proteomics identified two biomarkers that robustly predict HF across diverse clinical settings. This approach could accelerate biomarker discovery for many diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wells et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure (n=1,315). Angiopoietin-2 and thrombospondin-2 levels vs. Lower levels (per 1 standard deviation increase) was evaluated on Acute heart failure diagnosis in the STRATIFY validation cohort (per 1 SD increase in angiopoietin-2) (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09-1.69).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: