Key result
Asundexian added to antiplatelet therapy does not increase major bleeding compared to placebo.
Why the study?
The safety profile of asundexian added to antiplatelet therapy regarding bleeding risk in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA was characterized.
Does asundexian added to antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of bleeding in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA?
RCT (n=12,254)
Does asundexian added to antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of bleeding in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA?
Hazard Ratio: 1.1 (95% CI 0.85–1.44)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.9% vs 1.7%
p-value: p=0.46
In patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA, adding asundexian to antiplatelet therapy does not significantly increase major bleeding, though it is associated with increased lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
No increase in major bleeding supports asundexian safety added to antiplatelet therapy in noncardioembolic stroke/TIA; extends prior RCT evidence of stroke reduction without excess bleeding.
BACKGROUND: OCEANIC-STROKE (XXX) showed that asundexian added to antiplatelet therapy reduced ischemic stroke without significantly increasing bleeding in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. We characterized bleeding categories, sites, and key subgroups. METHODS: In the safety population, 12 254 participants received at least 1 dose of asundexian (n=6124) or placebo (n=6130). Bleeding was categorized by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria as major, clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM), or minor. While-on-treatment analyses included events through 2 days after the last dose, with death and permanent discontinuation as competing risks. RESULTS: Major bleeding occurred in 117 (1.9%) participants with asundexian and 107 (1.7%) with placebo (cause-specific hazard ratio [csHR], 1.10 [95% CI, 0.85–1.44]; P =0.46). Major or CRNM bleeding occurred in 339 (5.5%) and 307 (5.0%), respectively (csHR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.96–1.30]; P =0.16), and any bleeding in 763 (12.5%) and 752 (12.3%) (csHR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.93–1.13]; P =0.65). Treatment effects for major and major or CRNM bleeding were consistent across prespecified subgroups, including planned dual antiplatelet therapy. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 41 (0.7%) and 36 (0.6%) participants. Any gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 186 (3.0%) and 147 (2.4%) (csHR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.03–1.59]), and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in 102 (1.7%) and 59 (1.0%) (csHR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.27–2.41]), primarily rectal bleeding. Any procedure-related bleeding and any mucosal bleeding did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Asundexian added to antiplatelet therapy reduced ischemic stroke without significantly increasing major, major or CRNM, or any bleeding. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding was more frequent with asundexian, whereas treatment effects on major and major or CRNM bleeding were consistent across prespecified subgroups. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT05686070.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eikelboom et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (n=12,254). Asundexian vs. Placebo was evaluated on Major bleeding (csHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.85-1.44, p=0.46). Asundexian added to antiplatelet therapy did not significantly increase major bleeding compared to placebo (1.9% vs 1.7%; csHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.85-1.44; P=0.46).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: