Key result
BUDAPEST-CRT tests CRT-D upgrade versus ICD in heart failure patients with RV pacing.
Why the study?
There is lack of conclusive evidence from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of CRT upgrade in patients with implanted PM or ICD with reduced LVEF and chronic heart failure.
RCT (n=360)
3:2 ratio (CRT-D vs. ICD)
Yes
Results from the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade RCT are not yet available; leaves open whether CRT-D upgrade improves outcomes over ICD in RV-paced HF.
Aims There is lack of conclusive evidence from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with implanted pacemakers (PM) or defibrillators (ICD) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic heart failure (HF). The BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of CRT upgrade from conventional PM or ICD therapy in patients with intermittent or permanent right ventricular (RV) septal/apical pacing, reduced LVEF, and symptomatic HF. Methods and results The BUDAPEST-CRT study is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, investigator-sponsored clinical trial. A total of 360 subjects will be enrolled with LVEF ≤ 35%, NYHA functional classes II–IVa, paced QRS ≥ 150 ms, and a RV pacing ≥ 20%. Patients will be followed for 12 months. Randomization is performed in a 3:2 ratio (CRT-D vs. ICD). The primary composite endpoint is all-cause mortality, a first HF event, or less than 15% reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are all-cause mortality, all-cause mortality or HF event, and LV volume reduction at 12 months. Tertiary endpoints include changes in quality of life, NYHA functional class, 6 min walk test, natriuretic peptides, and safety outcomes. Conclusion The results of our prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial will provide important information on the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) upgrade in patients with symptomatic HF, reduced LVEF, and wide-paced QRS with intermittent or permanent RV pacing. Clinical trials.gov identifier NCT02270840.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merkely et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Heart Failure with reduced LVEF and right ventricular pacing (n=360). CRT-D upgrade vs. ICD therapy only was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, first HF event, or less than 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 12 months. The BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study is a prospective, randomized trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of upgrading to CRT-D versus ICD therapy in patients with heart failure and right ventricular pacing; results are not yet available.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: