Why the study?
Maintenance of intended rate or rhythm control following hospitalization in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation is a key therapeutic goal, but post-discharge monitoring and classification of predictive heart rate phenotypes are not well established.
Does a nurse-led, multidisciplinary, home-based intervention improve days-alive and out-of-hospital in hospitalized patients across a broad spectrum of chronic heart disease compared to standard management?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,226)
Outcomes masked to group allocation; open-label for patients and health workers
Blinded, computer-generated randomized protocol with a predetermined, block randomization sequence
Yes
Does a nurse-led, multidisciplinary, home-based intervention improve days-alive and out-of-hospital in hospitalized patients across a broad spectrum of chronic heart disease compared to standard management?
Absolute Event Rate: 90.1% vs 87.2%
p-value: p=0.02
A nurse-led, home-based multidisciplinary intervention improves long-term event-free survival and reduces recurrent hospitalizations across a broad spectrum of chronic heart diseases.
Supports integration of nurse-led home-based care into chronic heart disease management; extends randomized evidence across broad populations.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia managed in clinical practice. Maintenance of intended rate or rhythm control following hospitalisation is a key therapeutic goal. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to assess post-discharge maintenance of intended AF control and classify potentially predictive heart rate (HR) phenotypes via electrocardiogram (ECG) Holter monitoring. METHODS: In a sub-study of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing AF-specific management with usual care, 24-hour ECG Holter monitoring was undertaken in 133 patients 7-14 days post-discharge. Intended rate and rhythm control were compared to Holter data. Analysis of the frequency distribution of mean hour-to-hour differences identified those with labile HRs. RESULTS: Mean age was 71 ± 10 years, 67 (50%) were male and mean HR was 72 ± 14 bpm. Most (89%) had persistent AF (median time in AF=39% (IQR 0-100%)). Uncontrolled HR (>90 bpm for >10% of recording) occurred in 35 (26%) patients and 49 (37%) patients did not achieve their intended rate (n=26) or rhythm control (n=23). Patients in the upper quartile of mean hour-to-hour HR variability were identified as persistently labile (n=33). A further group (n=22) with periodically labile HRs was identified. Those with coronary artery disease (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13-0.91, p=0.033) or renal disease/dysfunction (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.06-0.98, p=0.047) were less likely to demonstrate HR stability (n=78). CONCLUSION: Post-discharge ECG Holter monitoring of AF patients represents a valuable tool to identify deviations in intended rhythm/rate control and adjust therapeutic management accordingly. It may also identify individuals who demonstrate labile HRs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ball et al. (2014) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic heart disease (acute coronary syndrome, atrial fibrillation, heart failure) (n=1,226). Nurse-led, multidisciplinary, home-based intervention (HBI) vs. Standard management was evaluated on Event-free survival expressed as the proportion of actual versus maximal unplanned days-alive and out-of-hospital (DAOH) (p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: