Key result
DOACs emerge as a potential alternative to warfarin for post-MI left ventricular thrombus.
Why the study?
Optimal pharmacological therapy for left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction remains challenging, with current guidelines recommending vitamin K antagonists despite their limitations.
Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) mirrors a rare but dreaded complication during the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Incidence rates differ among observational studies from 1.6% to 39%.1 Optimal pharmacological therapy to ensure thrombus resolution without risking major adverse events remains a challenging approach in affected individuals. While dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after stent implantation is mandatory for the reduction of atherothrombotic events, oral anticoagulation is also indicated in case of present LVT formation. Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) for LVT after AMI confers an increased risk for major bleeding events and adverse patient outcome, since current guidelines only recommend vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for thrombus resolution.2 Especially, the narrow therapeutic window of international normalized ration (INR) values poses a major concern in VKA therapy, necessitating frequent monitoring and varying time in therapeutic range (TTR). Considering lower rates of intracranial haemorrhage and bleeding events, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrick Sulzgruber (2021) studied Left ventricular thrombi after myocardial infarction. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin / Vitamin K antagonists was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants are discussed as an alternative to warfarin for left ventricular thrombi after myocardial infarction, with no quantitative clinical results reported in the abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: