Carbon pricing may shift fuel choice without selecting the lowest-emission pathway. We evaluate heavy fuel oil (HFO), liquefied natural gas (LNG), hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), green hydrogen, and green ammonia for a 4,253 TEU Panamax ship on the Singapore–Tokyo route, 2026–2050. The framework combines total cost of ownership (TCO), well-to-wake (WtW) emissions, cargo-capacity loss, transition timing, and two-tier fuel-intensity pricing. Without pricing, HFO minimizes TCO and emits 5,206.3 kt CO 2 e. At Tier 1 and Tier 2 prices of US$100/t CO 2 e and US$380/t CO 2 e, LNG Newbuild 2026 minimizes TCO. For a 10-year-old vessel, it reduces emissions by 11.8% but raises TCO by 89.5% over no-policy HFO. HVO switching in 2026 reduces emissions by 78.2%. Raising Tier 1 lowers LNG’s Tier 2 threshold but raises parity TCO. Appraisal should consider thresholds, ownership costs, and lifecycle emissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: