Background: We evaluated phase-specific associations between perioperative hemodynamic variables and 30-day mortality following aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and to assess the utility of post-CPB variables in risk stratification. Methods: We analyzed 691 patients who underwent aortic surgery requiring CPB. Hemodynamic variables were assessed during the preoperative, pre-incision, pre-CPB, and post-CPB phases and included heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), shock index (SI; HR/SBP), and modified shock index (MSI; HR/MBP). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Holm correction was applied to the between-group comparisons of hemodynamic variables. Adjusted Cox models used ridge penalization and included surgery group, CPB time, and mean post-CPB vasoactive-inotropic score. Results: Thirty patients (4.3%) died within 30 days. After Holm correction, significant differences between survivors and non-survivors remained only for post-CPB SBP, MBP, SI, and MSI. In adjusted Cox models, 30-day mortality was associated with higher post-CPB SI (hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.38 [1.17 to 1.64] per 0.1-unit increase; p < 0.001) and MSI (1.29 [1.12 to 1.47] per 0.1-unit increase; p < 0.001), as well as lower SBP (1.60 [1.24 to 2.05] per 10-mmHg decrease; p < 0.001) and MBP (2.00 [1.32 to 3.03] per 10-mmHg decrease; p = 0.001); in contrast, HR and DBP did not show a significant association with 30-day mortality. Kaplan–Meier analyses confirmed poorer survival across ROC-derived post-CPB thresholds for HR, SBP, MBP, SI, and MSI (all log-rank p ≤ 0.013). Conclusions: Post-CPB SBP, MBP, SI, and MSI showed significant adjusted associations with 30-day mortality and may assist in early postoperative risk stratification. These exploratory findings require external validation, and the identified thresholds should not be interpreted as treatment targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: