Key result
Latent class analysis identifies five distinct cardiovascular risk profiles missed by conventional IraPEN stratification.
Why the study?
Conventional cardiovascular risk-stratification tools like WHO/ISH (IraPEN) may not adequately capture the heterogeneity of risk profiles within the population.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,281)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Latent class analysis reveals heterogeneous and clustered cardiovascular risk profiles that conventional risk tools like IraPEN may fail to accurately capture.
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major public health concern, and conventional risk-stratification tools, such as WHO/ISH (IraPEN), may not adequately capture the heterogeneity of risk profiles within the population. This study aimed to identify the underlying patterns of CVD risk factors among employees undergoing routine occupational health assessments in Iran. Methods: In this cross-sectional secondary analysis, data from 1,281 adults aged 40-79 years attending a governmental occupational health clinic in 2024 were analyzed. Core cardiovascular risk variables-including sex, diabetes, smoking, systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol-were used. Latent class analysis (LCA) employing a five-class model was conducted. Results: Five latent classes of cardiovascular risk were identified, reflecting heterogeneous conditions. These classes included high-risk males without DM (population share: 0.1824), hyperlipidemic non-smoking females (population share: 0.1487), low-risk individuals (population share: 0.3011), high-risk males without hypertension (population share: 0.36), and high-risk males without hyperlipidemia (population share: 0.0079). Conclusion: The LCA-based classification identified five distinct and internally homogeneous cardiovascular risk profiles that captured sex-specific and metabolically clustered patterns of risk. This approach reveals heterogeneity not reflected in the conventional IraPEN five-tier risk groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikbakht et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk (n=1,281). Cardiovascular risk profiles vs. Conventional IraPEN classification was evaluated on Distribution of latent classes of cardiovascular risk factors. Latent class analysis identified five distinct cardiovascular risk profiles capturing sex-specific and metabolically clustered patterns not reflected in conventional IraPEN stratification.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: