Key result
Digital strategies boost HFrEF GDMT optimization, especially within structured remote care pathways.
Why the study?
GDMT reduces morbidity and mortality in HFrEF, yet underuse and suboptimal up-titration remain common, and the comparative effectiveness of digital and algorithmic strategies is uncertain.
Do digital and algorithmic strategies improve GDMT initiation and up-titration in adults with HFrEF compared to usual care?
Systematic Review (n=3,706)
Do digital and algorithmic strategies improve GDMT initiation and up-titration in adults with HFrEF compared to usual care?
Digital strategies that embed care into structured remote titration pathways show strong promise for closing the persistent implementation gap in HFrEF guideline-directed medical therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remote digital pathways may accelerate GDMT optimization in HFrEF; extends RCT evidence favoring structured titration over passive alerts.
Background: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) reduces morbidity and mortality in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), yet underuse and suboptimal up-titration remain common. Digital and algorithmic strategies are increasingly being used to address these gaps, but their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidance and was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251268580). PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception through 26 December 2025. Randomized and comparative studies enrolling adults with HFrEF were eligible if they evaluated digital, algorithm-based, or telemonitoring strategies designed to facilitate GDMT initiation, titration, or optimization versus usual care. Results: Six randomized comparative trials involving 3706 participants were included. Interventions comprised provider-facing electronic health record alerts and digitally enabled remote titration or telemonitoring pathways. Five of the six trials showed improvements in medication-optimization outcomes; the single neutral trial was a provider-facing alert intervention that showed no difference in GDMT prescribing at hospital discharge. Remote pathway-based strategies demonstrated the largest effects, including higher titration completion (82.1% vs 53.8% at 6 months; an absolute difference of approximately 28 percentage points) and greater improvements in therapy scores. Alert-based interventions showed mixed findings, including no difference in overall GDMT class prescribing at discharge in one inpatient trial (34% vs 34%). Meta-analysis was not performed because of substantial heterogeneity in interventions, outcomes, and reporting formats. Conclusion: Digital strategies appear to improve GDMT optimization in HFrEF, particularly when embedded within structured care pathways that enable repeated reassessment and protocol-driven titration. Passive alerts alone appear less effective. Standardized outcome measures and trials evaluating clinical endpoints are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gautam et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=3,706). Digital and algorithmic strategies (remote titration pathways and provider-facing EHR alerts) vs. Usual care was evaluated on GDMT initiation, up-titration, or overall optimization (not meta-analyzed due to heterogeneity). Digital strategies improved GDMT optimization in HFrEF across five of six trials, particularly when embedded within structured remote care pathways, whereas passive alerts alone were less effective.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: