Key result
Mitral annular driveline routing enables feasible exteriorization for left atrial assist devices while avoiding blood exposure.
Why the study?
The optimal driveline exteriorization configuration for the left atrial assist device implanted in the mitral position was not established.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Requires coronary artery avoidance for mitral annulus driveline routing; extends anatomic feasibility but leaves open in vivo safety for left atrial assist devices.
BACKGROUND: The left atrial assist device (LAAD) is a novel pump that was developed specifically for the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The device is surgically implanted in the mitral position. This study aimed to characterize the various device-fitting configurations in the mitral annular position. METHODS: Rapidly prototyped LAAD models (n = 5) were fabricated with five different driveline configurations: (A) annulus level/intra-cuff running; (B) supra-cuff/below coronary sinus (CS); (C) infra-cuff; (D) supra-annulus/supra-CS; (E) left ventricular free wall level. The 3D-printed models were implanted in extracted fresh porcine hearts (80-100 kg, adult, healthy porcine) and the proximity of anatomical structures between the driveline and CS and coronary artery (CA) were measured. RESULTS: All five device configurations were evaluated for fitting. For the purpose of preventing blood clot formation around the driveline, the mitral annulus (MA) as a driveline pass-way (configuration A) has been considered advantageous with the current device, in that the driveline exposure to blood has been avoided. The CS does not exist at exactly the same level as the MA, and there is less risk of injuring it than using the left atrial free wall. However, there is an inevitable risk of damaging the CA, so careful visual inspection before inserting the driveline is needed. CONCLUSIONS: Several options of driveline exteriorization were demonstrated, and the safety of each configuration was evaluated. Using the MA as a pathway for the driveline exit is considered to be a reasonable and safe method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyagi et al. (2022) studied Healthy porcine hearts (device intended for HFpEF) (n=5). Left atrial assist device (LAAD) 3D-printed prototypes (5 driveline configurations) was evaluated on Proximity of anatomical structures (coronary sinus and coronary artery) to the driveline and evaluation of device fitting. Using the mitral annulus as a pathway for the left atrial assist device driveline exit avoided blood exposure and was established as a feasible exteriorization method, provided the coronary artery is avoided.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: