Key result
High age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index linked to ~76% higher risk of CV death or HF hospitalization.
Why the study?
The role of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in characterizing comorbidity burden and its association with clinical characteristics, guideline-directed medical therapy use, and outcomes in heart failure is unclear.
Does a higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) score predict worse clinical outcomes and lower guideline-directed medical therapy use in patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=117,419)
Yes
Does a higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) score predict worse clinical outcomes and lower guideline-directed medical therapy use in patients with heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 1.76 (95% CI 1.69–1.83)
A higher comorbidity burden as measured by the ACCI strongly discriminates risk in heart failure, correlating with greater disease severity, lower use of GDMT, and increased mortality and hospitalizations.
BACKGROUND: The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) is a validated weighted measure of comorbidity burden, but has an unclear role in heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: To characterize age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) in HF, its association with the use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and with outcomes. METHODS: In the Swedish HF registry, patients were divided into 3 groups based on ACCI scores (low 1-3, intermediate 4-6, and high ≥7). We studied its association with clinical characteristics and GDMT use. Multivariable multinominal and Cox regressions were used to analyze ACCI and its association with ejection fraction (EF) category (reduced [HFrEF], mildly reduced [HFmrEF], preserved [HFpEF]), and with outcomes up to 3 years. RESULTS: Among 117,419 patients (age 75 [66-82], 36% women, 53% HFrEF, 24% HFmrEF, 23% HFpEF, median ACCI was 5, 6 and 6 respectively. ACCI ≥7 was present in 31% with HFrEF, 35% with HFmrEF and 42% with HFpEF. A higher ACCI score was associated with higher EF category, NYHA class, serum NT-proBNP, diuretic use, and lower quality of life and GDMT use (p<0.05 for all). The risk of composite CV mortality/first HF hospitalization was higher with intermediate (adjusted HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.29-1.39) and high vs low ACCI (1.76, 1.69-1.83). High ACCI category (vs low) was significantly associated with non-CV (adjusted HR 6.36, 95% CI 5.75-7.04), but also, CV mortality (4.35, 3.99-4.74), and total hospitalizations (adjusted IRR 2.16, 2.11-2.22) but also HF hospitalizations 1.23 (1.17-1.28). CONCLUSION: The ACCI discriminates well in HF, with higher ACCI being associated with greater severity of HF, lesser GDMT use and worse quality of life. Higher ACCI was more strongly associated with death than hospitalization. Higher ACCI was more strongly associated with non-CV outcomes but also with CV and HF outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farooqui et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure (n=117,419). High age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (≥7) vs. Low age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (1-3) was evaluated on Composite CV mortality or first HF hospitalization (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.69-1.83). High age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (≥7 vs 1-3) was associated with an increased risk of composite CV mortality or first heart failure hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.69-1.83).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: