Key result
Pre-existing hyperlipidemia linked to ~3.2-fold higher risk of new coronary events during VEGFRI therapy.
Why the study?
Coronary events in cancer patients treated with VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are an emerging concern with poorly defined incidence, predictors, and clinical implications.
What are the incidence and predictors of new coronary events in cancer patients treated with VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors?
Cohort (n=290)
What are the incidence and predictors of new coronary events in cancer patients treated with VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors?
Coronary events represent a clinically meaningful toxicity affecting 11% of cancer patients on VEGFR TKIs, strongly predicted by baseline hyperlipidemia and frequently leading to subsequent heart failure.
Background Coronary events are an emerging concern in cancer patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFRI TKIs), yet their incidence, predictors, and clinical implications remain poorly defined. Purpose We aimed to characterize the burden, risk factors, and outcomes of new coronary events in patients receiving VEGFRI therapy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 290 cancer patients treated with axitinib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, or pazopanib between 2015–2023. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of a new coronary event occurring during VEGFRI therapy or within one year of treatment completion. Coronary events included ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and myocardial injury. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess risk factors and clinical outcomes. Results New coronary events occurred in 32 patients (11%) at a median of 492 days following VEGFRI initiation (IQR 264–977). Events included 4 STEMI, 12 NSTEMI, and 16 myocardial injury presentations. Five patients required percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent placement, while the remainder were managed medically. Patients experiencing coronary events were significantly more likely to develop new-onset heart failure compared with those without events (34% vs 14%, p = 0.0087). All-cause mortality was similar between cohorts at three-year follow-up, and Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated no significant difference in survival (p = 0.056). Baseline demographics were similar between groups. On univariate analysis, patients with coronary events were more likely to have pre-existing hyperlipidemia (69% vs 48%, p = 0.041). Other cardiovascular comorbidities and baseline cardiac medications were comparable. Patients with coronary events were less likely to have prior anthracycline exposure (6% vs 23%, p = 0.047). While overall VEGFRI exposure duration did not differ significantly, patients with coronary events had longer immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure (749 vs 334 days, p = 0.041). On multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, race, comorbidities, and oncologic exposures, hyperlipidemia independently predicted coronary events (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.14–9.22, p = 0.03), while prior anthracycline exposure was independently protective (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03–0.83, p = 0.049). The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.744). Conclusions New coronary events represent a clinically meaningful toxicity of VEGFRI therapy and are frequently accompanied by subsequent heart failure. Hyperlipidemia identifies patients at increased risk, while the protective association of anthracycline exposure may reflect treatment selection or survivor bias. These findings underscore the importance of cardiovascular risk stratification, lipid management, and longitudinal surveillance in patients receiving VEGFRI TKIs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wright et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cancer treated with VEGFRI TKIs (n=290). Pre-existing hyperlipidemia vs. No pre-existing hyperlipidemia was evaluated on New coronary events (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.14-9.22, p=0.03). In cancer patients receiving VEGFRI therapy, pre-existing hyperlipidemia independently predicted an increased risk of new coronary events (OR 3.16; 95% CI 1.14-9.22; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: