Key result
Prior cancer increases death or rehospitalization only in patients with high NT-proBNP.
Why the study?
The prognostic impact of a history of cancer in patients with recurrent hospitalizations for acute heart failure and its interaction with HF severity were incompletely understood.
Does a history of cancer worsen outcomes in patients hospitalized for recurrent acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=845)
Yes
Does a history of cancer worsen outcomes in patients hospitalized for recurrent acute heart failure?
A history of cancer is not an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in the general population of recurrent acute heart failure patients, but it confers higher risk in those with advanced disease as marked by elevated NT-proBNP.
Does not support routine adjustment for cancer history in HF risk models; leaves open a possible interaction with elevated NT-proBNP for future validation.
Background Heart failure (HF) and cancer frequently coexist, yet the prognostic impact of a history of cancer in patients with recurrent hospitalizations for acute HF remains incompletely understood. In particular, whether cancer history modifies outcomes according to HF severity and whether prognostic determinants differ by cancer status are unclear. Methods This post hoc analysis used data from the multicenter, prospective SAVIOR-L study, which enrolled patients hospitalized for acute HF exacerbation with at least one HF-related admission in the preceding year. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of a history of cancer. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and urgent rehospitalization. Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were performed overall and stratified by N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, using cut-offs of 900 and 1341 pg/mL consistent with the original study. Results Among 845 patients, 151 (17.9%) had a history of cancer. Overall, cancer history was not independently associated with all-cause mortality or the primary endpoint. Kaplan–Meier analyses showed comparable outcomes between groups. However, among patients with NT-proBNP ≥1341 pg/mL, those with a history of cancer had a significantly higher incidence of the primary endpoint, whereas no difference was observed in patients with lower NT-proBNP levels. In stratified stepwise analyses, prognostic determinants differed by cancer history: renal function and conventional HF markers predominated in patients without cancer history, whereas inflammatory, nutritional, and cardiopulmonary factors were more prominent in those with prior cancer. Conclusions In patients with recurrent hospitalizations for acute HF, a history of cancer was not an independent predictor of adverse outcomes overall. However, its prognostic relevance emerged in patients with advanced HF, as reflected by markedly elevated NT-proBNP levels. Distinct prognostic profiles according to cancer history underscore the need for integrated risk stratification incorporating inflammatory, nutritional, and frailty-related factors in HF patients with prior cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukumoto et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in recurrent acute heart failure (n=845). History of cancer vs. Absence of a history of cancer was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death and urgent rehospitalization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: