Key result
Samsung smartwatch systolic blood pressure accuracy slightly deteriorates post-exercise, differing by ~3 mmHg from reference monitors.
Why the study?
It remains unclear whether smartwatches can fully replace traditional oscillometric cuff-based devices for blood pressure measurement under real-world conditions including after exercise.
Does smartwatch measurement accurately reflect blood pressure and heart rate compared to a standard patient monitor before and after exercise in healthy individuals?
Does smartwatch measurement accurately reflect blood pressure and heart rate compared to a standard patient monitor before and after exercise in healthy individuals?
Mean Difference: 2.9
Absolute Event Rate: 2.9% vs -0.3%
While smartwatch heart rate measurements remain accurate after exercise, blood pressure measurements exhibit a decline in accuracy and systematically distort values deviating from the calibration point.
Post-exercise smartwatch BP readings merit clinical caution; leaves open validation needs across devices and populations.
Blood pressure (BP) is a key vital sign that many people around the world are increasingly monitoring continuously using smartwatches. It remains unclear whether smartwatches can fully replace traditional oscillometric cuff-based devices under real-world conditions. The aim of this study was to verify the accuracy of BP and heart rate (HR) measurements using smartwatches compared to a standard patient monitor before and after a short-term exercise. Twenty-seven participants underwent an experimental part divided into three phases: pre-exercise, exercise, and post‑exercise. BP and HR were measured simultaneously with a Samsung smartwatch Watch Active2 or Watch3 and a patient monitor Datex-Ohmeda S/5 two times before and four times after exercise. The results showed a slight deterioration in the accuracy of smartwatch blood pressure measurements after exercise compared to values measured before exercise (-0.3 ± 6.3 vs. 2.9 ± 8.8 for systolic BP and 1.0 ± 4.8 vs. 1.9 ± 5.7 for diastolic BP given as mean ± standard deviation). Furthermore, smartwatches underestimated high BP readings and overestimated low BP readings. On the other hand, measuring HR with smartwatches proved to be very accurate even after exercise (-0.8 ± 3.7 vs. 0.0 ± 2.5). The study confirmed the accuracy of smartwatch heart rate measurements but questioned the accuracy of smartwatch BP measurements taken at values far from the calibration point.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rafl-Huttova et al. (2026) studied Healthy volunteers (n=27). Samsung smartwatch (Galaxy Watch Active2 or Watch3) vs. Datex-Ohmeda S/5 patient monitor was evaluated on Mean difference and standard deviation of systolic blood pressure between smartwatch and patient monitor after exercise (Mean difference 2.9 ± 8.8 mmHg). Samsung smartwatches demonstrated a slight deterioration in the accuracy of systolic blood pressure measurements after short-term exercise, exhibiting a post-exercise mean difference of 2.9 ± 8.8 mmHg compared to the reference monitor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: