Key result
Cardiovascular disease vulnerability clusters significantly across India, concentrating in eastern and northeastern districts.
Why the study?
Socioeconomic, environmental, and infrastructural disparities contribute to cardiovascular disease vulnerability in India, necessitating a district-level assessment framework.
Observational (n=788,974)
Effect estimate: Global Moran's I 0.636
p-value: p=0.001
A spatially disaggregated vulnerability index highlights that eastern and northeastern Indian districts face the highest CVD risk due to degraded air quality, poor healthcare access, and suboptimal diet.
May inform district-level CVD targeting in India; leaves open prospective validation before guiding policy.
In this study, we develop a district-level vulnerability index for cardiovascular diseases in India, addressing the persistent public health challenges posed by socioeconomic, environmental, and infrastructural disparities. Drawing on 26 indicators across seven domains, viz., socioeconomic, physiological, behavioural, healthcare, dietary, and environmental (both indoor and outdoor), we sourced data from the National Family Health Survey-5, Rural Health Statistics 2021-22, and satellite datasets. After preprocessing, curating, and integrating these datasets to a uniform scale, we applied a one-common-factor model to derive weights for each indicator for calculating domain scores. These domain scores were then computed and aggregated into an overall vulnerability score, assigning equal weight to each domain. Further to understand the spatial patterns, we employed Global Moran’s I and Anselin’s Local Moran’s I statistics. The results highlight noticeable vulnerability in eastern and northeastern districts, including Kolkata, Haora, Kamrup Metropolitan, and Paschim Barddhaman, primarily due to degraded air quality, inadequate healthcare access, and suboptimal dietary practices. In contrast, districts in hilly and western regions, such as Bageshwar, Barmer, Rudraprayag, Chamba, Agar Malwa, and Pali, demonstrate lower vulnerability, supported by favourable air quality indices, nutritious diets, and physically active lifestyles influenced by rugged terrain. Global Moran’s I yielded a value of 0.636 (Z = 27.17, pseudo p-value = 0.001), indicating strong spatial autocorrelation, while local analysis revealed high-high clusters in the east and low-low clusters in western and hilly areas. It is important to note that this index captures potential future vulnerability based on current structural, environmental, and behavioural risk conditions, rather than reflecting actual current disease burden. This index provides a valuable framework for pinpointing and addressing CVD vulnerabilities at the local level, underscoring the imperative for tailored public health strategies and interventions by policymakers and researchers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gayathri et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular diseases (n=788,974). Multidimensional vulnerability factors (socioeconomic, environmental, behavioral, healthcare, physiological) vs. Districts with low vulnerability was evaluated on Spatial autocorrelation of cardiovascular disease vulnerability index (Global Moran's I 0.636, p=0.001). A district-level vulnerability index for cardiovascular diseases in India demonstrated strong spatial autocorrelation (Global Moran's I 0.636), with significant high-vulnerability hotspots identified in eastern and northeastern regions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: