Key result
Proximal HV interval measurements average ~5 ms longer than distal recordings, with shorter intervals in women.
Why the study?
The influence of recording site and sex on His–ventricular interval values is not well defined, impacting diagnosis of infranodal conduction disease.
Does measurement location and sex impact the values of His-ventricular (HV) intervals recorded using high-density mapping catheters in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Cross-Sectional (n=67)
No
Does measurement location and sex impact the values of His-ventricular (HV) intervals recorded using high-density mapping catheters in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
HV intervals vary significantly based on the exact recording site and patient sex, suggesting that current universal cutoffs for diagnosing infranodal conduction delay may miss clinically relevant delays in distal measurements and in women.
HV intervals differ by site and sex; leaves open whether adjusted thresholds improve conduction delay diagnosis.
Background Accurate assessment of the His–ventricular (HV) interval is essential to diagnosing infranodal conduction disease, but the influence of recording site and sex on HV values is not well defined. Objective To evaluate the impact of measurement location and sex on HV interval values using high-density (HD) mapping catheters in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods We prospectively studied patients in sinus rhythm undergoing AF ablation. HV intervals were measured with a decapolar catheter and a HD mapping catheter at the end of the procedure. HD-based HV intervals were classified as proximal (HV prox ), distal (HV dis ), and right bundle (HV RB ) recordings. Conduction velocities and sex-specific differences were analyzed. Results A total of 67 patients (mean age 64 ± 10 years, 33%women) were evaluated. The clinical HV interval was 45 ± 9 ms and shorter in women (40 ms vs. 47 ms, p < 0.001). HV prox was longer than HV dis (51 ± 10 ms vs. 46 ± 10 ms, p < 0.001) and HV RB (37 ± 10 ms; p < 0.001). Abnormal HV intervals (> 55 ms) were more often detected using HV prox than HV dis or HV RB . Conduction velocities did not differ by sex and correlated poorly with surface ECG parameters. Conclusion HV interval measurements vary significantly by recording site and sex. Proximal measurements reveal longer HV intervals and detect more conduction delays, while women have systematically shorter HV intervals. Anatomical precision and sex-specific interpretation are important for accurate diagnosis of infranodal conduction delay. Graphical Abstract Abbreviations: Dis: Distal His-Ventricle measurement, Prox: Proximal His-Ventricle measurement, RB: His-ventricle measurement over the right bundle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serban et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=67). Proximal high-density mapping catheter recording vs. Distal recording was evaluated on His-ventricular (HV) interval duration (MD 5.1 ms, 95% CI 4.4-5.8, p=<0.001). Proximal His-ventricular interval measurements were significantly longer than distal recordings (51 vs 46 ms), and women had consistently shorter intervals than men across all measurement sites.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: