Key result
Pre-procedural loss of septal Q waves is linked to ~2.8-fold higher odds of post-TAVI QRS widening.
Why the study?
Risk stratification for conduction disturbances after TAVI in patients without baseline PR or QRS prolongation remains limited, and the role of loss of septal Q waves has not been systematically evaluated.
Does the pre-procedural loss of septal Q waves (LSQ) predict post-procedural QRS widening in patients undergoing TAVI without baseline PR or QRS prolongation?
Observational (n=87)
No
Does the pre-procedural loss of septal Q waves (LSQ) predict post-procedural QRS widening in patients undergoing TAVI without baseline PR or QRS prolongation?
Loss of septal Q waves on pre-procedural ECG may serve as a simple, non-invasive predictor of conduction system vulnerability and subsequent QRS widening following TAVI.
LSQ was associated with post-TAVI QRS widening; hypothesis-generating for conduction risk stratification and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances remain a common complication following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). While baseline conduction abnormalities are well-established predictors of post-procedural conduction disease or permanent pacemaker implantation, risk stratification in patients without baseline PR or QRS prolongation remains limited. Loss of septal Q waves (LSQ) may reflect underlying conduction system vulnerability but has not been systematically evaluated in this setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at a single tertiary center between 2018 and 2024. Patients without baseline PR or QRS prolongation were included. LSQ was defined as the absence of Q waves in leads I, V5, and V6. The primary outcome was an increase in QRS duration ≥ 20 ms. RESULTS: Among 87 patients without baseline PR or QRS prolongation, 86 were evaluable for the primary outcome and QRS widening ≥20 ms occurred in 31 patients (36.0%). LSQ was present in 40.2% of patients. LSQ was associated with increased odds of QRS widening in unadjusted analysis (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.09-6.74; p = 0.031). The association remained significant after adjustment for AF (adjusted OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.07-7.11; p = 0.035) (Table 2). AF was also independently associated with QRS widening (adjusted OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.10-13.08; p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: LSQ on pre-procedural ECG was independently associated with post-procedural QRS widening in patients undergoing TAVI without baseline PR or QRS prolongation. LSQ may serve as a simple, non-invasive marker of conduction system vulnerability with potential utility in risk stratification and post-procedural monitoring. These findings are hypothesis generating and warrant validation in larger prospective cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alkharji et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Post-procedural conduction disturbances following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (n=87). Loss of septal Q waves (LSQ) vs. Presence of septal Q waves was evaluated on Increase in QRS duration ≥ 20 ms (adjusted OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.07-7.11, p=0.035). Loss of septal Q waves was independently associated with an increased odds of post-procedural QRS widening ≥20 ms after TAVI (adjusted OR 2.76; 95% CI 1.07-7.11; p=0.035).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: