Key result
Transseptal mitral valve-in-valve implantation after prior aortic and tricuspid TAVR achieves a ~6 mmHg gradient.
Why the study?
Structural valve degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valves in elderly patients with prior surgical replacements presents a growing clinical challenge, with limited data on sequential transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures across multiple valve positions.
Case Report (n=1)
This case demonstrates the feasibility and short-term safety of sequential transcatheter valve replacements across three valve positions (aortic, tricuspid, and transseptal mitral valve-in-valve) in high-risk patients with structural valve degeneration.
Structural valve degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valves is a growing challenge in elderly patients with prior surgical valve replacements. Transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures have emerged as an effective treatment option for high-risk patients with failing bioprostheses. We report the case of an 84-year-old female patient with progressive mitral stenosis and regurgitation following biological mitral and aortic valve replacement (2008), who had previously undergone ViV transcatheter aortic valve replacement (2023) and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement using an EVOQUE™-system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) (2024). Most recently, degeneration of the mitral bioprosthesis led to progressive dyspnea and heart failure symptoms. Due to high surgical risk (EuroSCORE-II 13.3%), a transseptal mitral ViV procedure was performed using a SAPIEN S3 Ultra Resilia™ valve (Edwards) with excellent procedural outcomes [mean pressure gradient 6 mmHg, no paravalvular leak, neo left ventricular outflow tract (neoLVOT) assessment 254 mm 2 ]. At two-month follow-up, hemodynamic parameters remained stable with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (50% biplane) and sustained symptomatic improvement (New York Heart Association Class I). This case demonstrates the feasibility and safety of transcatheter ViV interventions in complex, multi-valve bioprosthetic degeneration, highlighting specific technical considerations including computed tomography-based neoLVOT assessment and management of prosthesis-prosthesis interactions. Learning objective This case demonstrates feasibility of sequential transcatheter valve replacements across three valve positions in high-risk patients using computed tomography-guided planning (neoLVOT ≥200 mm 2 ). Critical learning points: 1.EVOQUE™ tricuspid replacement might increase transseptal puncture complexity but does not contraindicate mitral access. 2.Comprehensive hemodynamic assessment (heart rate, blood pressure, effective orifice area) is challenging in multivalvular heart disease due to changing flow volumes across diseased and prosthetic valves. 3.Long-term surveillance is needed in complex multivalvular heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galk et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Structural valve degeneration in multivalvular heart disease (n=1). Transseptal mitral valve-in-valve (ViV) procedure using a SAPIEN S3 Ultra Resilia valve was evaluated on Procedural and hemodynamic outcomes (mean pressure gradient, paravalvular leak, neoLVOT, LVEF, NYHA class). Transseptal mitral valve-in-valve implantation in a patient with prior aortic and tricuspid transcatheter replacements was feasible and resulted in a mean gradient of 6 mmHg at two months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: