Key result
Oral anticoagulant knowledge links weakly to better warfarin adherence, but not to anticoagulation control.
Why the study?
Anticoagulant knowledge, medication adherence, time in therapeutic range, and potential drug-drug interactions are poorly understood but impact thromboembolic events, bleeding, and mortality in chronic warfarin therapy.
Cross-Sectional (n=126)
No
Effect estimate: ρ = 0.24
p-value: p=0.006
In adults on chronic warfarin therapy, anticoagulation knowledge is weakly associated with adherence but not with objective anticoagulation control, highlighting the complex factors affecting warfarin management.
BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant knowledge, medication adherence, time in therapeutic range (TTR), and potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) are poorly understood, but they can increase the risk of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and mortality. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between oral anticoagulation knowledge and adherence in adults on long-term warfarin therapy, and their associations with TTR, clinical and demographic factors, bleeding risk, and pDDIs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included adults on chronic warfarin therapy at a university-affiliated cardiology clinic. Turkish versions of the validated Oral Anticoagulation Knowledge (OAK) and Anticoagulant Therapy Adherence Scale (ATAS) assessed oral anticoagulation knowledge and adherence. Clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were obtained from health records, and lifestyle information via patient interviews. pDDIs were evaluated using UpToDate RESULTS: The study included 126 adults on warfarin therapy, with a median TTR of 31.9% and 76% of patients below 60%. Patients exhibited moderate oral anticoagulant knowledge and relatively high self-reported adherence scores. A weak positive correlation (ρ = 0.24, p = 0.006) was detected between OAK and ATAS scores, while a negative correlation (ρ=-0.179, p = 0.045) was found between OAK and concurrent medications excluding warfarin. Education and employment status were associated with OAK scores, while the frequency of vitamin K-rich food consumption was associated with ATAS scores. Age and renal impairment were associated with an increased number of concurrent medications excluding warfarin and pDDIs identified by both UpToDate CONCLUSION: Anticoagulation knowledge was weakly associated with adherence to warfarin therapy but not with anticoagulation control. Dietary behaviours, polypharmacy, and pDDIs may influence anticoagulation outcomes, highlighting the need for multifaceted management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çakır et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic warfarin therapy (n=126). Oral anticoagulation knowledge and adherence was evaluated on Correlation between oral anticoagulation knowledge (OAK) and adherence (ATAS) scores (ρ = 0.24, p=0.006). Oral anticoagulant knowledge demonstrated a weak positive correlation with medication adherence (ρ = 0.24, p = 0.006) among adults on chronic warfarin therapy, but not with anticoagulation control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: