Key result
Early M-TEER is linked to ~30% lower 3-year mortality compared to delayed repair in DMR.
Why the study?
Current guidelines offer limited guidance on the optimal timing of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in degenerative mitral regurgitation with heart failure.
Does early M-TEER compared to delayed M-TEER reduce mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation and heart failure?
Cohort (n=1,061)
Does early M-TEER compared to delayed M-TEER reduce mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation and heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 0.7 (95% CI 0.52–0.95)
Absolute Event Rate: 25.1% vs 32.7%
p-value: p=0.020
In patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation and heart failure, performing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair within 1 year of diagnosis is associated with improved survival and fewer heart failure hospitalizations.
Current guidelines offer limited guidance on the optimal timing of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) in degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). We evaluated whether the interval between diagnosis of DMR with heart failure (HF) and M-TEER was associated with clinical outcomes. We analyzed 1,061 patients with DMR who underwent M-TEER, stratified by timing: early group (n=667, ≤1 year after DMR-HF diagnosis) versus delayed group (n=394, >1 year after DMR-HF diagnosis). Echocardiographic markers of cardiac damage were compared. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, the composite of mortality and HF hospitalization, and changes in HF hospitalization and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV symptoms. The early group had less cardiac damage (higher ejection fraction, smaller left ventricular dimensions and left atrial volume index) and lower rates of atrial fibrillation and severe tricuspid regurgitation (all P<0.05). At 3 years, mortality (25.1% vs 32.7%, P=0.013) and the composite endpoint (34.1% vs 45.8%, P=0.015) were lower in the early group. Earlier intervention was independently associated with lower risks of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.95, P=0.020) and the composite endpoint (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.89, P=0.004). Within 1 year, HF hospitalization fell from 71.8% to 7.0% (early group) and 62.2% to 8.4% (delayed group), and NYHA class III/IV symptoms from 58.6% to 3.3% and 61.7% to 4.0%, respectively. In conclusion, in patients with DMR and HF, earlier M-TEER was associated with lower mortality and fewer adverse events, although causality cannot be inferred. Both groups showed reductions in HF hospitalizations and improved symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimura et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Degenerative mitral regurgitation with heart failure (n=1,061). Early mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (≤1 year after diagnosis) vs. Delayed mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (>1 year after diagnosis) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95, p=0.020). Early mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair was associated with lower 3-year mortality compared to delayed repair in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52-0.95).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: