Key result
Left bundle branch area pacing significantly narrowed QRS duration compared to intrinsic rhythm (116.0 vs 136.8 ms; median Δ -21.0 ms, 95% CI -33.9 to -18.6; P<0.001).
Why the study?
QRS narrowing alone may incompletely characterize electrical resynchronization during left bundle branch area pacing in patients with conduction delay.
Does left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) improve QRS duration and ultra-high-frequency ECG dyssynchrony metrics compared to intrinsic rhythm in patients with bradycardia and wide QRS?
Does left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) improve QRS duration and ultra-high-frequency ECG dyssynchrony metrics compared to intrinsic rhythm in patients with bradycardia and wide QRS?
Effect estimate: median Δ -21.0 ms (95% CI -33.9 to -18.6)
Absolute Event Rate: 116% vs 136.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with bradycardia and wide QRS, left bundle branch area pacing produces significant QRS narrowing and improves complementary ultra-high-frequency ECG markers of residual electrical dyssynchrony.
BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may restore a more physiological pattern of ventricular activation in patients with conduction delay; however, QRS narrowing alone may incompletely characterize electrical resynchronization. Ultra-high-frequency ECG (UHF-ECG) provides quantitative markers of ventricular activation timing and dyssynchrony. OBJECTIVE: To quantify paired OFF-to-ON changes in conventional ECG and UHF-ECG metrics during LBBAP in patients with baseline wide QRS and to assess the relationship between paced R-wave peak time (RWPT) and residual UHF-ECG dyssynchrony. METHODS: In this prospective single-center paired study, 21 patients with bradycardia and baseline wide QRS underwent standard ECG and UHF-ECG assessment during intrinsic rhythm (pacing OFF) and during LBBAP (pacing ON). Endpoints included QRS duration, signed VED16, absolute VED16 (|VED16|), mean ventricular delay (meanVD), and a clinically interpretable distance-to-normal metric defined as dist = max(|VED16|-20, 0). Paired changes were summarized as medians with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Associations between paced RWPT and residual dyssynchrony during pacing were evaluated using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: LBBAP significantly narrowed QRS duration from 136.8 [130.2-153.6] ms during intrinsic rhythm to 116.0 [107.8-125.6] ms during pacing (median Δ -21.0 ms; 95% CI -33.9 to -18.6; p < 0.001). Signed VED16 did not change significantly (median Δ 0.4 ms; p = 1.000), consistent with the mixed conduction-phenotype composition of the cohort. In contrast, severity-oriented UHF-ECG endpoints improved: |VED16| decreased numerically (median Δ -5.2 ms; p = 0.070), whereas dist decreased significantly (median Δ -0.7 ms; 95% CI -14.4 to 0.0; p = 0.015). The proportion of patients within the normal dyssynchrony band (|VED16| ≤ 20 ms) increased from 7/21 (33.3%) to 12/21 (57.1%). Median paced RWPT was 66.6 [58.6-74.6] ms, and shorter RWPT correlated with lower residual |VED16| during pacing (Pearson r = -0.45, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with baseline wide QRS, LBBAP produces marked QRS narrowing, whereas UHF-ECG provides complementary quantification of residual electrical dyssynchrony. Severity-oriented UHF-ECG endpoints, particularly a distance-to-normal metric, may offer an interpretable mechanistic framework beyond conventional ECG alone. Shorter paced RWPT was associated with lower residual dyssynchrony during pacing, supporting physiological coherence between procedural and high-resolution electrocardiographic markers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yessenov et al. (2026) studied bradycardia and baseline wide QRS (n=21). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) vs. Intrinsic rhythm (pacing OFF) was evaluated on QRS duration (median Δ -21.0 ms, 95% CI -33.9 to -18.6, p=<0.001). Left bundle branch area pacing significantly narrowed QRS duration compared to intrinsic rhythm (116.0 vs 136.8 ms; median Δ -21.0 ms, 95% CI -33.9 to -18.6; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: