Key result
EIVOM linked to ~3.2-fold higher risk of delayed pericardial effusion after AF ablation.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
The incidence, clinical features, and mechanism of delayed pericardial effusion following ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall during AF ablation remain poorly defined.
Does ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall increase the risk of delayed pericardial effusion in patients undergoing ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=15,101)
Does ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall increase the risk of delayed pericardial effusion in patients undergoing ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation?
Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall during AF ablation is associated with a significantly increased risk of delayed, severe pericardial effusion requiring invasive management, highlighting the need for extended postprocedural echocardiographic monitoring.
BACKGROUND Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) improves outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, its association with delayed pericardial effusion (PE)-specifically its incidence, clinical features, and mechanism-remains poorly defined. OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the risk of delayed PE associated with EIVOM and characterize its clinical profile, management, and outcomes. METHODS This study analyzed 15,101 patients with persistent AF from the China-AF Registry, stratified into an EIVOM group (n = 8,151) and a non-EIVOM group (n = 6,950). The primary endpoint was delayed PE, defined as newly detected PE >10 mm occurring ≥7 days after ablation and resulting in rehospitalization. Propensity score overlap weighting was applied to balance baseline covariates between groups. RESULTS Delayed PE occurred in 0.17% of the total cohort, with a higher incidence in the EIVOM group compared with the non-EIVOM group (0.25% vs 0.07%). EIVOM was an independent risk factor for delayed PE (overlap-weighted HR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.15-8.74; P = 0.025). Delayed PE in the EIVOM group tended to manifest late (median 38 days vs 14 days), with large effusion size and severe systemic inflammation. Management in the EIVOM group frequently required invasive intervention (17 of 20 [85%]). Notably, 20% (4 of 20) of patients with EIVOM-related delayed PE experienced recurrence post-discharge, requiring prolonged management. CONCLUSIONS EIVOM is associated with an increased risk of delayed PE, characterized by late onset, systemic inflammation, frequent need for invasive management, and high recurrence risk. These findings support the need for extended echocardiographic monitoring beyond the standard postprocedural period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (n=15,101). Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) vs. Non-EIVOM was evaluated on Delayed pericardial effusion (PE), defined as newly detected PE >10 mm occurring ≥7 days after ablation and resulting in rehospitalization (HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.15-8.74, p=0.025). Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall was associated with a higher risk of delayed pericardial effusion compared with non-EIVOM (0.25% vs 0.07%; HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.15-8.74; P=0.025).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: