Key result
Extraction of advisory ePTFE-coated ICD leads achieves ~99% clinical success with low major complication rates.
Why the study?
Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-coated ICD leads are associated with progressive coil calcification and rising shock impedance prompting a safety advisory, but data regarding the safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction for these chronic leads remain limited.
Does transvenous lead extraction achieve high procedural success and safety in patients with advisory ePTFE-coated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads?
Cohort (n=423)
Yes
Does transvenous lead extraction achieve high procedural success and safety in patients with advisory ePTFE-coated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads?
Transvenous lead extraction of advisory ePTFE-coated ICD leads at experienced centers demonstrates high procedural success (98.8% clinical success) and low major complication rates (0.9%), unaffected by impedance-defined coil calcification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports extraction feasibility for advisory ePTFE-coated ICD leads at experienced centers; leaves open prospective validation of long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-coated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads are associated with progressive coil calcification and rising shock impedance, prompting a recent safety advisory. However, data regarding the safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for these chronic leads remain limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and procedural outcomes of TLE in patients with advisory ePTFE-coated ICD leads. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study at 13 centers of patients undergoing TLE of ePTFE-coated ICD leads. Primary endpoints included procedural success, complications, and short-term mortality. Multivariable analyses identified predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: Among 423 patients undergoing extraction of advisory RELIANCE ICD leads (Boston Scientific), mean lead dwell time was 7.5 ± 5.3 years, and impedance-defined coil calcification was present in 15.1%. Laser sheaths were used in 63.8% of procedures and multiple extraction tools in 21.7%. Complete lead removal was achieved in 95.5%, clinical success in 98.8%, and extraction failed occurred in 1.2%. Major complications occurred in 0.9% of patients, with no procedural deaths. Calcified leads were associated with longer dwell times but not higher rates of major complications. Thirty-day mortality was 2.8%, primarily among patients undergoing extraction for infection. CONCLUSIONS: In this large multicenter cohort, TLE of advisory ePTFE-coated ICD leads was associated with high procedural success and low major complication rates despite long lead dwell times. Outcomes were consistent with contemporary TLE experience and do not suggest increased procedural risk attributable to this lead model. The presence of impedance-defined coil calcification did not adversely affect procedural outcomes, supporting TLE at experienced centers when clinically indicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gad et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients with advisory ePTFE-coated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads undergoing transvenous lead extraction (n=423). Transvenous lead extraction of advisory ePTFE-coated ICD leads was evaluated on Procedural success (clinical success and complete lead removal), major complications, and 30-day mortality. Transvenous lead extraction of advisory ePTFE-coated ICD leads achieved 98.8% clinical success and 95.5% complete removal, with 0.9% major complications and 2.8% 30-day mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: