Why the study?
Respiratory failure after surgery and major invasive procedures is a life-threatening complication affecting ~10 million patients annually, yet no guidelines exist for risk assessment and prevention of postprocedural respiratory failure.
An international expert panel provides the first set of formal practice recommendations to risk-stratify and mitigate postoperative and postprocedural respiratory failure.
Respiratory failure after surgery and other major invasive procedures, defined as the unanticipated need for invasive or noninvasive ventilation, is a life-threatening complication affecting ~10 million patients annually. At present, there are no guidelines for risk assessment and prevention of postprocedural respiratory failure. We developed expert-informed practice recommendations for the prediction and prevention of postoperative and postprocedural respiratory failure. These recommendations focused on modifiable pre- and post-procedural risk factors and implementation feasibility, using a structured multidisciplinary expert panel process. An international expert panel reviewed current literature, supplemented evidence gaps with expert opinion, and drafted preliminary action statements. Iterative voting rounds were used to refine expert panel statements, which were classified as recommendations with broad applicability and low likelihood of delaying care, or suggestions that can be applied selectively. The study panel included 25 experts from four continents and multiple medical disciplines. An initial set of 54 preliminary statements was refined into 13 recommendations and 15 suggestions. Recommendations included using screening tools systematically, promoting tobacco cessation, reconsidering procedure timing in patients with symptomatic respiratory tract infections, mobilising patients early and maximising upright positioning, maintaining good oral hygiene, using noninvasive respiratory support to minimise need for invasive ventilation, and minimising deep sedation while promoting early tracheal extubation. These recommendations reflect expert interpretation of a broad and heterogeneous body of evidence and provide practical strategies to predict and prevent postprocedural respiratory failure, offering a framework for future study of a risk-targeted care bundle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiyatkin et al. (2026) conducted a review in Postoperative and postprocedural respiratory failure (n=25). Expert-informed practice recommendations and suggestions was evaluated on Consensus on recommendations and suggestions for prediction and prevention of postprocedural respiratory failure. The multidisciplinary expert panel achieved consensus on 13 broadly applicable recommendations and 15 targeted suggestions to predict and prevent postoperative and postprocedural respiratory failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: