Key result
CORPULS pre-hospital notification shows no door-to-balloon time benefit over the LIFENET system.
Why the study?
Effective pre-hospital communication systems are essential for STEMI care, and the impact of a new smartphone app notification system on door to balloon times was unknown.
Does a new smartphone application for pre-hospital notification (CORPULS) improve door to balloon times in STEMI patients compared to an email/SMS based system (LIFENET)?
Observational (n=153)
No
Does a new smartphone application for pre-hospital notification (CORPULS) improve door to balloon times in STEMI patients compared to an email/SMS based system (LIFENET)?
The implementation of a smartphone-based pre-hospital notification system achieved equivalent, excellent door to balloon times compared to a legacy email/SMS system.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Equivalent door-to-balloon times with CORPULS versus LIFENET; leaves open whether smartphone apps enhance STEMI prehospital workflows.
ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requires effective pre-hospital communication to ensure excellent patient outcomes. Recently, NSW rolled out a new pre-hospital notification system for STEMI – CORPULS, a new app based pre-hospital notification system compared to the previous email/phone based system LIFENET. To ensure the implementation of a new app based system did not impact on door to balloon times (DBTs) of STEMI patients, a retrospective audit was performed. Method A retrospective audit of patients presenting to a single metropolitan centre for Primary PCI with pre-hospital notification were included for 18 months prior to the changeover utilising the old LIFENET system compared to the first 18 months with the new CORPULS system. Analysis was then performed comparing DBTs between groups. Results A total of 153 patients were included. There was no statistically significant difference in DBTs between the groups; both in hours and out of hours (combined 43.5 min vs 43 min (p=0.9732) out-of-hours 56.8 min vs 54.2 min (p=0.5294), in hours 25 min vs 31 min (p=0.3534) ( Table, Figure ). Conclusion Overall, there was no significant difference in door to balloon times between the new CORPULS pre-hospital notification system and the previous LIFENET system. | Lifenet median door to balloon time (mins) (IQR) | | Corpuls median door to balloon time (mins) (IQR) | U Statistic | p-value | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Combined | 43.5 (27.0–59.0) | 43.0 (32.0–56.0) | 2,402.5 | 0.9732 | | In-hours | 25.0 (20.2–33.2) | 31.0 (22.5–36.0) | 333.5 | 0.3534 | | Out-of-hours | 56.8 (44.2–65.8) | 54.2 (42.2–64.2) | 919.5 | 0.5294 |
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGhie et al. (2026) conducted an observational in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=153). CORPULS app-based pre-hospital notification system vs. LIFENET email/phone-based system was evaluated on Combined median door to balloon time (mins) (p=0.9732). The CORPULS pre-hospital notification system did not change median door to balloon times compared to the LIFENET system.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: