Purpose: To characterize layer-specific, potentially non-linear associations between axial length (AL) and macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), outer-retinal, and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in a nationally representative sample of Korean adults. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–2021. Right eyes of adults ≥19 years with AL and optical coherence tomography measurements were included; eyes with major retinal or optic-nerve disease or implausible measurements were excluded. Survey-weighted spline regression tested non-linearity by a design-based nested comparison adjusted for age and sex. Ocular magnification, refractive error, and intraocular pressure were addressed in sensitivity analyses. Results: Among 9867 participants (mean age 42.6 years; AL 24.4 mm), AL was associated with all four layers (all P < 0.001). GCIPL was nonlinear (P < 0.001), steepening at longer AL, and remained so after adjustment for magnification and refractive error. The RNFL association was not robust to magnification correction: a keratometry-based correction moved the slope from −2.2 to +0.2 µm/mm (P = 0.48), and an axial-length–only factor reversed it, indicating over-correction. Outer retina was essentially preserved (≈−0.4 µm/mm), whereas SFCT showed the largest, approximately linear association (≈−31.8 µm/mm). Excluding ocular hypertension did not change the findings. Conclusions: The apparent RNFL thinning with longer AL was largely attributable to scan-circle magnification rather than tissue thinning. The other layers differed in form: a non-linear GCIPL association and a large, approximately linear choroidal reduction, with outer-retinal preservation. Interpretation should account for AL, magnification, and functional form across layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: