Key result
Octogenarians undergoing PCI face ~3.5-fold higher in-hospital mortality compared to younger patients.
Why the study?
The procedural risks of PCI for octogenarians have not been well established.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians carry higher in-hospital complication risks compared to younger patients?
Cohort (n=109,708)
Yes
Does percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians carry higher in-hospital complication risks compared to younger patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.8% vs 1.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Octogenarians undergoing PCI face a two- to four-fold higher risk of in-hospital complications compared to younger patients, driven heavily by comorbidities, though procedural safety improved over the study period.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to define the risks facing octogenarians undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). BACKGROUND: The procedural risks of PCI for octogenarians have not been well established. METHODS: We compared the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of 7,472 octogenarians (mean age 83 years) with those of 102,236 younger patients (mean age 62 years) who underwent PCI at 22 National Cardiovascular Network (NCN) hospitals from 1994 through 1997. RESULTS: Octogenarians had more comorbidities, more extensive coronary disease and a two- to fourfold increased risk of complications, including death (3.8% vs. 1.1%), Qwave myocardial infarction (1.9% vs. 1.3%), stroke (0.58% vs. 0.23%), renal failure (3.2% vs. 1.0%) and vascular complications (6.7% vs. 3.3%) (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Independent predictors of procedural mortality in octogenarians included shock (odds ratio [OR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3 to 8.8), acute myocardial infarction (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.3 to 4.4), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.1 to 3.9), renal insufficiency (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.0 to 3.8), first PCI (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.3), age >85 years (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.7) and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.0). For elective procedures, octogenarian mortality varied nearly 10-fold, and was strongly influenced by comorbidities (0.79% mortality with no risk factors vs. 7.2% with renal insufficiency or LVEF <35%). Despite similar case-mix, PCI outcomes in octogenarians improved significantly over the four years of observation (OR of 0.61 for death/myocardial infarction/stroke in 1997 vs. 1994; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Risks to octogenarians undergoing PCI are two- to fourfold higher than those of younger patients, strongly influenced by comorbidities, and have decreased in the stent era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batchelor et al. (2000) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (n=109,708). Octogenarian age (≥80 years) vs. Younger patients (mean age 62 years) was evaluated on In-hospital death (p=<0.001). Octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention experienced significantly higher rates of in-hospital death compared to younger patients (3.8% vs. 1.1%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: