Key result
PCI in octogenarians linked to ~3-fold higher in-hospital mortality versus younger patients despite high procedural success.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention have different in-hospital outcomes and mortality in octogenarians compared to non-octogenarians?
Observational (n=22,741)
Yes
Does percutaneous coronary intervention have different in-hospital outcomes and mortality in octogenarians compared to non-octogenarians?
PCI in octogenarians is highly successful and improves quality of life, despite being associated with higher procedural complications and in-hospital mortality compared to younger patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher mortality risk warrants cautious selection in octogenarians; leaves open whether age-specific trials can refine risk-benefit estimates.
OBJECTIVE: Due to the growing ageing population worldwide, more percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are being performed on elderly patients; however, current national data in Southeast Asian developing countries regarding patient characteristics, procedural details and PCI outcomes in elderly patients are insufficient. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Nationwide registry from 39 primary PCI facilities across Thailand. PARTICIPANTS: Between May 2018 and August 2019, the Thai PCI registry enrolled a total of 22 741 patients who underwent PCI. We examined patient characteristics, PCI technique and in-hospital outcomes in octogenarians (≥80 years) and non-octogenarians (18-79 years). RESULTS: There were 2099 patients (9.2%) over the age of 80. Octogenarians were at greater risk for atherosclerosis and calcified coronary lesions that required plaque modification and a higher risk of cardiogenic shock during presentation than non-octogenarians. The success rate of PCI in octogenarians was high (95.5%) and comparable to non-octogenarians (96%). The respective PCI failure rate in non-octogenarians and octogenarians was 4% and 4.5% (p=0.251). Octogenarians had a substantially greater incidence of periprocedural problems (5.6% vs 4.5%, p=0.011). PCI was linked with more than threefold increase in in-hospital mortality in octogenarians compared with non-octogenarians (7.67% vs 2.3%, p 0.001). Nonetheless, revascularisation with PCI in octogenarians increased the EQ-5D (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions) score by 15.7 after PCI and before hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: According to the Thai PCI registry, octogenarians had more complicated coronary anatomy, as well as higher procedural complications and mortality than non-octogenarians. Nonetheless, PCI in the octogenarian had a high success rate and potentially improved the patient's quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ratanapo et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=22,741). Percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians (≥80 years) vs. Percutaneous coronary intervention in non-octogenarians (18-79 years) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=<0.001). Percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians was associated with a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate compared to non-octogenarians (7.67% vs 2.3%), despite a high procedural success rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: