Why the study?
The relationship between preoperative left ventricular function and long-term survival and functional recovery after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation was unclear.
Does C-SENSE acceleration with a factor of 3 reduce breath-hold duration while providing comparable diagnostic image quality and accurate ventricular volumetric indices compared to standard BH SENSE in patients undergoing CMR?
Cohort (n=62)
Does C-SENSE acceleration with a factor of 3 reduce breath-hold duration while providing comparable diagnostic image quality and accurate ventricular volumetric indices compared to standard BH SENSE in patients undergoing CMR?
Effect estimate: p less than 0.001
Absolute Event Rate: 92% vs 51%
p-value: p=<0.001
C-SENSE acceleration with a factor of 3 significantly reduces breath-hold times for cardiovascular MRI while maintaining comparable ventricular volumetric accuracy and image quality to standard SENSE sequences.
Postoperative survival and left ventricular function were studied in 62 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for isolated, chronic aortic regurgitation between 1978 and 1985. The average follow-up period was 3.8 years. There were three in-hospital and six late deaths. Five (56%) of the nine postoperative deaths were of cardiac-related causes. The mean 7 year survival rate was 83 +/- 5%. Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic volume index was the most important indicator (p less than 0.001) for subsequent cardiac death. The 6.5 year survival rate was 92 +/- 4% for patients with an end-systolic volume index less than 200 ml/m2 compared with 51 +/- 16% for those whose index was greater than 200 ml/m2. None of the 48 patients with an end-systolic volume index less than 200 ml/m2 died of cardiac-related causes. Twenty-three of the 48 patients with an end-systolic volume index less than 200 ml/m2 (Group 1) and 6 of the 12 patients with a higher index (Group 2) underwent repeat catheterization 26 months postoperatively. Preoperative afterload, assessed by end-systolic wall stress, was elevated in both groups, but decreased postoperatively, becoming identical to the afterload in 20 normal control subjects. Although the preoperative ejection fraction was depressed in both groups, the great majority of patients in Group 1, compared with none in Group 2, exhibited normal ejection fraction postoperatively. Thus, in patients who recently underwent surgery for aortic regurgitation, satisfactory late results in both long-term survival and reversal of left ventricular dysfunction were obtained when the preoperative end-systolic volume index was less than 200 ml/m2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taniguchi et al. (1987) conducted a cohort in isolated, chronic aortic regurgitation (n=62). Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic volume index < 200 ml/m2 vs. Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic volume index > 200 ml/m2 was evaluated on 6.5 year survival rate (p less than 0.001, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: