Key result
SGLT2 inhibitors are linked to reduced myocardial extracellular volume and improved LV strain in HFpEF.
Why the study?
The short-term effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on myocardial extracellular volume and left ventricular function in patients with HFpEF and diabetes mellitus were not well characterized.
Does SGLT2 inhibitor therapy improve myocardial extracellular volume and cardiac function in patients with HFpEF and diabetes mellitus?
Cohort (n=32)
Single-blind (CMR assessors)
No
Does SGLT2 inhibitor therapy improve myocardial extracellular volume and cardiac function in patients with HFpEF and diabetes mellitus?
Absolute Event Rate: 27.3% vs 27.1%
p-value: p=<0.001 for interaction
SGLT2 inhibitor therapy is associated with favorable extracellular matrix remodeling and functional cardiac improvements in patients with HFpEF and diabetes.
SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with favorable remodeling on imaging in diabetic HFpEF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve prognosis and symptoms. To evaluate the short-term effects of SGLT2i on myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) and left ventricular (LV) function in patients with HFpEF and diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with HFpEF and DM (32 subjects) received either SGLT2i (treatment group) or not (control group) in addition to standard care. Assessments were conducted at baseline and after six months. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) were measured to assess systolic function, left atrial strain (LAstrain) was used to evaluate diastolic function. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was performed to measure ECV. C-reactive protein (CRP) and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) levels were also measured. The mean age of the participants was 67 ± 9 years (62% male). No significant differences were observed between groups at baseline. In comparison to the control group, the SGLT2i group demonstrated improved LVGLS (SGLT2i: from − 16.4 (1.7)% to − 17.2 (2.5)%, p = 0.01 vs. Control group: from − 17.2 (1.8)% to − 16.9 (2.2)%, p = 0.13), LAstrain (SGLT2i: 14.0 (2.0)% to 15.5 (2.0)%, p = < 0.001 vs. Control group: 13.0 (1.8)% to 13.6 (1.8)%, p = 0.02), ECV (SGLT2i: 28.3 (1.9) % to 27.3 (1.8) %, p < 0.001; Control: 26.9 (2.4) % to 27.1 (2.3) %, p = 0.16) along with reductions in CRP and NT-proBNP. In patients with HFpEF and DM, SGLT2i treatment improves ECV along with systolic and diastolic echocardiographic parameters. These findings highlight the underlying mechanisms contributing to the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2i in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marathonitis et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and diabetes mellitus (n=32). SGLT2 inhibitors vs. Standard care was evaluated on Change in myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) measured by CMR at 6 months (p=<0.001 for interaction). In patients with HFpEF and diabetes, SGLT2 inhibitor therapy significantly reduced myocardial extracellular volume and improved left ventricular global longitudinal strain over 6 months (p<0.001 for interaction).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: