The rapid accumulation of polyolefin waste and the simultaneous generation of spent refinery catalysts pose serious environmental and resource management challenges, demanding integrated valorization strategies. Herein, a blended spent–fresh fluid (sFCC–fFCC) catalytic cracking system is proposed as a dual-waste solution for temperature-controlled catalytic pyrolysis of high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Physicochemical characterization (XRD, ED-XRF, NH 3 -TPD) showed that fresh FCC possessed high total acidity (1.177 mmol g −1 ), while spent FCC exhibited lower acidity (0.294 mmol g −1 ) but contained metal-containing deposits that may influence dehydrogenation and hydrogen-transfer reactions. Calcination at 900 °C reduced the total acidity and high-temperature acid-site population, thereby suppressing excessive secondary cracking and improving liquid selectivity. Non-catalytic pyrolysis required ≥540 °C to achieve maximum oil yield (71.33 wt%), whereas the best-performing 50S50F catalyst blend reduced the optimal oil production temperature to 435 °C, delivering 67.94 wt% oil with negligible char (<1 wt%). Excess catalyst loading (15 wt%) promoted over-cracking and increased gas yield to 62.6 wt%, while 10% provided optimal selectivity. GC-DHA analysis revealed catalytic pyro-oil enriched in olefins (32–38%) and aromatics (8–14%). The pyro-oils exhibited high heating values (41–42 MJ kg −1 ) and low viscosity (0.49–0.86 mPa s), indicating effective in situ upgrading. Gas analysis showed enhanced light-olefin production, with propylene selectivity reaching 26.07%. The 50S50F blend exhibits a favorable balance between acidity and metal functionality, facilitating the selective conversion of HDPE into fuel-range hydrocarbons and light olefins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nawaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: