Seismic-induced building damage prediction is essential for disaster mitigation and risk assessment. However, traditional methods often require detailed structural parameters that are labor-intensive to obtain, while post-earthquake remote sensing is frequently hindered by data latency. To address these limitations, we propose a novel framework utilizing pre-event multi-source satellite data to predict damage, employing building height and construction period as proxies for structural types. Taking the 2023 Türkiye Mw 7.8 earthquake as a case study, we modeled the weighted building cluster damage ratio (WBCDR) using 26 predictors derived from remotely sensed building key attributes, seismic parameters, topography, and spectral-textural features. Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) models were evaluated at spatial scales of 300 m, 500 m, and 1 km. RF outperformed SVR, with the best mean test performance at 500 m across ten splits (R2 = 0.8248, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) = 0.0482, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) = 0.0916). Notably, Pseudo-Spectral Acceleration at 0.3 s (PSA03), Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), and textural Dissimilarity were identified as dominant influencing factors. The proposed framework enables rapid and effective large-scale seismic building damage prediction in areas lacking detailed structural information, providing valuable support for seismic risk assessment and emergency response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: