Background/Objectives: We examined nine biomarkers for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) detection, necrosis and postoperative prediction. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and indexed citation links were searched on 10 October 2026 without a lower publication-year limit. PubMed and citation searches used an October 2026 publication cutoff. English- and Russian-language clinical reports with at least 10 participants were eligible. Narrative synthesis used QUADAS-2 and diagnostic GRADE. Results: Twenty-nine primary reports were included, with reported cohorts of 18–1479 participants. Cohort overlap and varying tested denominators precluded an unduplicated participant total. Among 28 diagnostic reports, 22 had high index-test risk and 25 had high flow/timing risk. Certainty was very low for eight markers. I-FABP, α-GST and citrulline findings depended on population, assay and timing. D-dimer, lactate, procalcitonin and ischemia-modified albumin lacked intestinal specificity. Urinary I-FABP estimates were imprecise. SM22 supplied association data without diagnostic-performance estimates. Conclusions: No evaluated marker supports reliable stand-alone exclusion of AMI or determination of bowel viability. Complementary panels require prospective validation. The injury diagrams are unvalidated research models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berikkhanov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: