Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative retrospective analysis identifies predictors of mortality in acute intestinal ischemia conditions, suggesting further validation needed.
Background/Objectives: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) resembles non-vascular intestinal ischemia (NSII) and non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP) at presentation yet carries 50–80% mortality. We tested how well admission data separate these conditions and predict in-hospital mortality, the primary endpoint. Methods: We studied 197 consecutive adults (2015–2021): AMI (n = 61), NSII (n = 62), and NSAP controls (n = 74). Admission demographics, comorbidities, laboratory markers, the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), and APACHE-II were compared by ROC/DeLong analysis and multivariable logistic regression (STROBE). Results: AMI had more atrial fibrillation, thromboembolism, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dyslipidemia (p ≤ 0.028) and higher in-hospital mortality than NSII (47.5% vs. 16.1%; p < 0.001). Inflammatory ratios, lactate, and albumin separated AMI from NSAP well (AUC up to 0.93) but from NSII modestly (lactate, 0.672). APACHE-II (AUC 0.861) and MPI (0.810) predicted in-hospital death and improved combined (0.897; DeLong p = 0.014). Independent predictors were MPI (adjusted odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.23), CKD (3.72, 1.25–12.10), and arterial lactate (1.20, 1.03–1.45). Conclusions: A composite admission panel was internally consistent but hypothesis-generating, not a triage tool ready for clinical use. CT angiography remains essential, since these markers cannot separate vascular from non-vascular ischemia; prospective external validation is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caliskan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: