Why the study?
The comprehensive intervention effects of a deputy chief nurse-led systematic nursing pathway on early hypertensive heart disease patients were not well established.
Does a systemic nursing pathway improve blood pressure control and LVEF in patients with early hypertensive heart disease?
RCT (n=240)
Single-blind (evaluator blinded)
Random number table method
No
Does a systemic nursing pathway improve blood pressure control and LVEF in patients with early hypertensive heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 50%
p-value: p=<0.001
A comprehensive systemic nursing pathway significantly improves blood pressure target attainment, treatment compliance, and early recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with early hypertensive heart disease.
May support systematic nursing for BP control in early hypertensive heart disease; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
目的:探讨副主任护师主导的系统性护理路径在早期高血压性心脏病患者中的综合干预效果,包括血压 控制、心功能改善、治疗依从性以及心理生活质量几个方面。方法:采用随机对照设计,240例靶器官损害期患者分 观察组和对照组,观察组走标准化护理路径,整合智能监测、分层随访、三方联动和心理干预;对照组常规护理。干 预6个月后,比较两组血压控制率、lvef变化、依从性的差异。结果:观察组在血压达标率、lvef提升幅度、完全依 从比例以及sas和sf-36评分改善上都优于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义。系统性护理路径实现了全病程连续管理, 治疗协同效应和治疗效果都得到了提升,患者的身心状态和长期管理能力也有改善。结论:该模式临床可行、可复制、 可推广,适合作为早期高血压性心脏病全病程管理的一部分,有助于延缓靶器官损害、降低远期心血管事件风险。
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
赵晓静 (2026) conducted an RCT in Early hypertensive heart disease (n=240). Systematic nursing path vs. Routine nursing was evaluated on Blood pressure control rate at 6 months (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: