Why the study?
Lifelong exposure to HIV and antiretroviral therapy may elevate cardiovascular risk as individuals with perinatally acquired HIV transition into adulthood.
Do subclinical electrocardiographic and echocardiographic abnormalities differ between young adults with perinatally versus non-perinatally acquired HIV?
Cross-Sectional
Do subclinical electrocardiographic and echocardiographic abnormalities differ between young adults with perinatally versus non-perinatally acquired HIV?
p-value: p=0.035
Subclinical cardiac abnormalities assessed by ECG and echocardiography are infrequent and comparable among young adults with HIV regardless of the mode of acquisition, though incomplete virologic suppression is associated with low-voltage ECG.
Infrequent subclinical abnormalities do not support routine screening in young adults with HIV; leaves open ECG utility for monitoring suppression.
BACKGROUND: Lifelong exposure to HIV and antiretroviral therapy (ART) may elevate cardiovascular risk as individuals with perinatally acquired HIV transition into adulthood. We evaluated subclinical electrocardiographic (ECG) and echocardiographic abnormalities in this population. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Thailand between 2022-2023. Young adults who acquired HIV perinatally were enroled, alongside age-matched adults who acquired HIV non-perinatally. Participants underwent standard ECG and screening echocardiography. RESULTS: = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical cardiac abnormalities were infrequent and comparable between young adults with perinatally and non-perinatally acquired HIV. Low-voltage ECG was associated with incomplete virologic suppression. Optimising antiretroviral regimens to maintain a suppressed viral load may help reduce subclinical cardiac abnormalities in young people with HIV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiralak et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in HIV. Perinatal HIV acquisition vs. Non-perinatal HIV acquisition was evaluated on Subclinical electrocardiographic (ECG) and echocardiographic abnormalities (p=0.035).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: