This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Mechanical metamaterials offer new opportunities for vibration suppression through architecture-driven control of dynamic response, overcoming limitations of conventional isolation techniques. This review presents a mechanism-based framework for the design and analysis of vibration-suppressing metastructures, classifying existing approaches into four physical attenuation mechanisms –geometry-induced attenuation, local resonance, dynamic stiffness tuning, and energy dissipation–, together with hybridization as a cross-cutting design strategy. For each category, the governing physical principles are linked to representative structural realizations, with emphasis on design strategies and manufacturable architectures. Wave-based bandgap concepts and transmissibility-based metrics are integrated, enabling consistent evaluation of finite, experimentally realizable systems. A curated database of reported designs is formed and analyzed using Ashby-type performance maps to compare attenuation frequency ranges, bandwidth, stiffness, and structural efficiency across mechanisms. Particular attention is given to design-for-manufacture considerations, including additive manufacturing-enabled geometries, multi-material integration, and scalability. Key challenges—such as broadband low-frequency attenuation, tunability, and load-bearing integration—are analyzed alongside emerging solutions based on nonlinear stiffness, multi-resonator systems, and hybrid material–structural concepts. The work provides a unifying framework for the design and physical realization of vibration-suppressing, advanced materials and structures, identifying applicability limits and trade-offs across attenuation mechanisms and open benchmarking needs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: