Key result
Higher preoperative E/e′ linked to ~16% higher odds of early LVEF improvement per unit after CABG.
Why the study?
The degree of systolic recovery after CABG in patients with reduced or mildly reduced LVEF is heterogeneous, and the association of preoperative E/e′ with early postoperative LV function improvement is unclear.
Does a higher preoperative E/e' ratio predict early improvement in left ventricular systolic function after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with LVEF <50%?
Cohort (n=72)
No
Does a higher preoperative E/e' ratio predict early improvement in left ventricular systolic function after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with LVEF <50%?
Odds Ratio: 1.155 (95% CI 1.044–1.278)
p-value: p=0.005
A higher preoperative E/e' ratio is associated with early echocardiographic improvement of left ventricular systolic function after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with LVEF <50%.
Higher preoperative E/e′ was associated with early LVEF recovery after CABG; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background In patients with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction, the degree of systolic recovery after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is heterogeneous. We assessed whether routine preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) indices—particularly E/e′—are associated with early postoperative improvement in left ventricular function. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing isolated CABG at a single tertiary center (April 2019 to July 2025). Eligibility required a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <50%. Emergency/salvage operations, 30-day deaths, and patients without an evaluable early postoperative TTE were excluded. The primary outcome was an absolute increase in the LVEF of ≥10 percentage points. Because of the limited number of outcome events, the primary association analysis used a single-predictor logistic regression model with preoperative E/e′. Sensitivity analyses excluded patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) and modeled postoperative LVEF as a continuous outcome adjusted for baseline LVEF. Results Of 75 otherwise clinically eligible patients, three lacked an evaluable early postoperative TTE, leaving 72 patients for outcome analysis; 17 (23.6%) achieved an LVEF increase of ≥10 percentage points. A higher preoperative E/e′ was associated with early LVEF improvement (OR 1.155 per 1-unit increase; 95% CI 1.04–1.28; p = 0.005; N = 66; 16 events). The apparent AUC was 0.700; after 1,000-resample bootstrap internal validation, the estimated optimism was 0.004 and the optimism-corrected AUC was 0.696 (95% bootstrap CI 0.526–0.885). The association persisted after excluding patients with AF (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.02–1.27; p = 0.025). In a sensitivity analysis using postoperative LVEF as a continuous outcome, E/e′ remained associated with postoperative LVEF after adjustment for baseline LVEF ( β = 0.31 percentage points per 1-unit increase; 95% CI 0.01–0.61; p = 0.042). Conclusion A higher preoperative E/e′ was associated with early improvement in LV systolic function after CABG among patients with a preoperative LVEF of <50% who survived to undergo early postoperative echocardiographic assessment. Given the small number of events and the single-center retrospective design, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Ischemic heart disease with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (n=72). Preoperative E/e′ vs. Per 1-unit decrease (or unexposed reference) was evaluated on Early postoperative improvement in LV systolic function (absolute increase in LVEF ≥10 percentage points) (OR 1.155, 95% CI 1.044-1.278, p=0.005). A higher preoperative E/e′ was significantly associated with early improvement in left ventricular systolic function after coronary artery bypass grafting (OR 1.155 per 1-unit increase).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: