Key result
Aerobic exercise yields inconsistent effects on blood pressure variability in women without clinical outcome data.
Why the study?
It remains unclear whether aerobic-component training meaningfully modifies blood pressure variability in women and whether BPV-focused intervention studies report hard cardiovascular outcomes.
Does aerobic-component training improve blood pressure variability in adult women?
Does aerobic-component training improve blood pressure variability in adult women?
Current evidence for aerobic training reducing chronic blood pressure variability in women is limited and heterogeneous, with a notable absence of studies reporting hard cardiovascular outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Insufficient evidence precludes targeting blood pressure variability with aerobic training in women; leaves open effects on cardiovascular mortality and events.
Blood pressure variability (BPV) is an independent cardiovascular risk marker associated with target-organ damage, cardiovascular events, and mortality. In women, however, it remains unclear whether aerobic-component training meaningfully modifies BPV and whether BPV-focused intervention studies report hard cardiovascular outcomes. This scoping review mapped and synthesized indexed literature on BPV responses to aerobic-component training in adult women. The review followed PRISMA-ScR and updated Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and was registered in the Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R2D4K ). Searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, the Virtual Health Library, and SciELO, without language or date restrictions, using Population-Concept-Context eligibility criteria. Women aged 18 years or older exposed to interventions with a predominant aerobic component were eligible when BPV was explicitly assessed with a validated method. Among 552 identified records, 527 unique records were screened and four reports were included, representing approximately 151 women from predominantly postmenopausal and selected clinical populations. Available studies suggest reductions in mean blood pressure and selected autonomic markers, whereas chronic BPV findings were heterogeneous. One pilot study reported a greater reduction in 24-hour systolic BPV with supervised exercise than with a home-based program. No included BPV-focused intervention study reported cardiovascular mortality or major cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodrigues et al. (2026) conducted a review in Blood pressure variability (n=151). Aerobic-component training vs. Control, alternative exercise, or home-based program was evaluated on Blood pressure variability (BPV) responses and cardiovascular outcomes. Aerobic-component training showed heterogeneous chronic effects on blood pressure variability in women, with no eligible studies reporting on cardiovascular mortality or major cardiovascular events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: