Key result
Higher QT and JT dispersion are linked to symptoms in genotyped long-QT syndrome patients.
Why the study?
QTc and QT dispersion have been suggested as markers of arrhythmic risk and therapy efficacy in LQTS, but their correlation with genetic status and symptoms needed evaluation.
Cross-Sectional (n=116)
May inform symptomatic risk stratification in genotyped families; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Rate corrected QT interval (QTc) and QT dispersion (QTd) have been suggested as markers of an increased propensity to arrhythmic events and efficacy of therapy in patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS). To evaluate whether QTc and QTd correlate to genetic status and clinical symptoms in LQTS patients and their relatives, ECGs of 116 genotyped individuals were analyzed. JTc and QTc were longest in symptomatic patients (n = 28). Both QTd and JTd were significantly higher in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic (n = 29) or unaffected family members (n = 59). The product of QTd/JTd and QTc/JTc was significantly different among all three groups. Both dispersion and product put additional and independent power on identification of mutation carriers when adjusted for sex and age in a logistic regression analysis. Thus, symptomatic patients with LQTS show marked inhomogenity of repolarization in the surface ECG. QT dispersion and QT product might be helpful in finding LQTS mutation carriers and might serve as additional ECG tools to identify asymptomatic LQTS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moennig et al. (2001) conducted a cross-sectional in Familial Long QT Syndrome (n=116). Electrocardiographic parameters (QT dispersion and QT product) vs. Unaffected family members was evaluated on Correlation of ECG parameters to genetic status and clinical symptoms. Among 116 genotyped individuals, QT and JT dispersion were significantly higher in symptomatic patients (n=28) than asymptomatic carriers (n=29) or unaffected relatives (n=59).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: