Key result
Submammary device implantation yields high long-term satisfaction, with ~97% of women endorsing the choice.
Why the study?
Device placement in women has unique considerations such as irritation from straps, body image changes, and cosmetic issues not addressed by standard implant techniques.
Does submammary device placement provide long-term patient satisfaction and acceptable complication rates in women requiring device implantation?
Cohort (n=51)
No
Does submammary device placement provide long-term patient satisfaction and acceptable complication rates in women requiring device implantation?
Submammary device placement offers an effective, cosmetically favorable alternative for women with high long-term satisfaction and low complication rates.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support cosmesis-focused shared decisions in women; extends observational data but leaves open need for randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Device placement in women has unique considerations not addressed with standard implant techniques. These may include irritation and discomfort from purse and/or bra straps, changes in body image, and cosmetic issues with visible scars. Submammary device placement (SMI) addresses these problems and may be associated with greater patient comfort, cosmesis, and device acceptance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Over a 9-year period, 51 women, mean age 47 years (range 13-70 years), underwent submammary device implantation at our institution. These included seven cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, 26 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and 18 pacemakers. Devices had been implanted for a mean of 57 months (range 2-118 months) when, in 2009, patient satisfaction was assessed via a telephone survey. Questions related to the initial decision, the preprocedure education, implant experience, recovery, complications, and long-term satisfaction. Seventy-three percent of women listed cosmesis as their main reason for SMI, 76% had a mammogram since implant, and 89% reported no issues with mammography. Ninety-seven percent felt that SMI was the right choice and 95% stated they would do SMI again. Ninety-five percent also said they would recommend the procedure to others. CONCLUSION: Complications were rare (three lead dislodgements and one pneumothorax). SMI has high patient acceptance and long-term satisfaction with few complications. This procedure should be considered in women requiring device implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
GIUDICI et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Women requiring cardiac device implantation (n=51). Submammary device placement was evaluated on Patient satisfaction (feeling it was the right choice). Submammary device implantation demonstrated high patient acceptance and long-term satisfaction, with 97% of women feeling it was the right choice and 95% stating they would do it again.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: