Key result
High-dose Albunex improves transthoracic pulmonary venous Doppler signal quality by ~1.7 points.
Why the study?
Transthoracic echocardiography provides pulmonary venous flow Doppler signals of limited quality in up to 25% of patients compared to transesophageal echocardiography.
Does intravenous injection of sonicated albumin improve the quality of transthoracic pulmonary venous flow Doppler signals in patients undergoing echocardiography?
Does intravenous injection of sonicated albumin improve the quality of transthoracic pulmonary venous flow Doppler signals in patients undergoing echocardiography?
Intravenous injection of a sonicated albumin contrast agent significantly improves the quality and measurable accuracy of transthoracic pulmonary venous Doppler signals.
May improve transthoracic pulmonary venous Doppler assessment in suboptimal windows; leaves open impact on diagnostic decisions versus transesophageal echocardiography.
OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to determine whether intravenous injection of a sonicated albumin echocardiographic contrast agent (Albunex) improved the quality of the transthoracic pulmonary venous flow Doppler signal. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that transesophageal echocardiography provides pulmonary venous flow Doppler signals superior in quality to those seen with transthoracic echocardiography, which are of limited quality in up to 25% of patients. METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent transthoracic pulsed wave Doppler examination of pulmonary venous flow before, during and after two doses of Albunex ranging from 0.08 ml/kg (low dose) to 0.22 ml/kg (high dose). In addition, five patients underwent transesophageal examination of pulmonary venous flow before and after a 0.08-ml/kg dose of Albunex. The efficacy of the contrast injection was determined using a score that graded the quality of the three components of the pulmonary venous Doppler signal from 0 to 3 (0 = no visible signal; 3 = optimal signal). RESULTS: Albunex enhanced the quality of the pulmonary venous Doppler signal from baseline (score 3.9 +/- 1.8 [mean +/- SD]) and at both low (score 5.1 +/- 2.2, p < 0.05) and high doses (score 5.6 +/- 2, p < 0.001). Transthoracic pulmonary venous flow velocities were increased, and peak flow velocity ratios were unchanged, after injection of contrast agent. The contrast-enhanced variables showed good agreement with transesophageal flow velocities. CONCLUSIONS: Albunex improves the quality of the transthoracic pulmonary venous Doppler signal, thus allowing improved accuracy of measurement. This approach appears to be effective for increasing the quality of data obtained from the transthoracic examination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (1995) studied Suboptimal transthoracic pulmonary venous flow Doppler signal (n=26). Sonicated albumin (Albunex) vs. Baseline (no contrast) was evaluated on Quality score of the three components of the pulmonary venous Doppler signal (p=<0.001). Intravenous injection of Albunex significantly improved the quality score of transthoracic pulmonary venous Doppler signals from 3.9 at baseline to 5.6 at high doses (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: