Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Although frailty is common in older adults, the relationship between vitamin D and frailty remains unclear. Using NHANES data, this study examined the association between frailty and serum vitamin D in middle-aged and older adults. METHODS: Eight thousand and sixty-four participants aged 40 and older from NHANES (2007-2018) underwent cross-sectional analysis. Serum vitamin D was categorized as deficiency (<25 nmol/L), insufficiency (25-50 nmol/L), or adequate (≥50 nmol/L). Frailty was quantified using a 49-item Frailty Index (FI) based on the cumulative deficit model; frailty was defined as FI ≥ 0.21. Logistic regression and restricted cubic splines were used. RESULTS: The deficiency group had the highest frailty prevalence (55.9%), followed by insufficiency (42.9%) and adequate (37.2%). Frailty was significantly associated with deficiency (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.42-3.25) after full adjustment, whereas insufficiency was not significantly associated with frailty (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.95-1.38). Serum vitamin D and FI showed a U-shaped dose-response relationship, robust across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: In middle-aged and older adults, vitamin D deficiency, but not insufficiency, is associated with higher frailty risk. Serum vitamin D may have a U-shaped association with FI. Monitoring vitamin D levels may help inform frailty management in aging populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: