This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
• Optimized H 2 production rate at 10 t/d via ethanol-steam reforming process. • Optimized reformer for treating 200 t/d feed: 0.18 m dia., 2 m length, 3.14 MW heat duty. • Achieved 95% CO 2 capture with absorber and stripper heights of 12.2 m and 5 m, and diameters of 1.22 m and 2.60 m. • Reduced hydrogen production cost to $3.5/kg, enhancing economic feasibility. • 16.6% IRR and $13M NPV over 6 years, indicating strong investment potential. An industrially relevant method for obtaining hydrogen from hydrocarbons without emitting carbon into the atmosphere involves ethanol-steam reforming followed by carbon capture. Herein, we present a detailed conceptual process using ethanol-stream reforming to produce blue hydrogen, integrated with a carbon capture plant, followed by a techno-economic analysis. In the first step, the Aspen plus-based simulation of ethanol-stream reforming reactions is performed to optimize the reforming reactor geometrical parameters for a 10 t/day of hydrogen production. Afterward, the carbon capture system was designed with a standalone absorber and stripper, which were subsequently integrated for solvent makeup calculation. Considering the target value of hydrogen production, the optimized reactor diameter and length were found to be 0.18 and 2 m, respectively, corresponding to reactant flow (200 t/day) and heat duty (3.14 MW) at optimal circumstances. Absorber and stripper packing heights of 12.2 m and 5 m, respectively, with column diameters of 1.22 m and 2.60 m are required to extract 95% CO 2 from the reformed product stream. The techno-economic analysis indicates that the cost of producing one kilogram of H 2 is $3.5. The computed internal rate of return is 16.6%, the discounted payback period is 6 years, and the net present value is $13 million.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: