Key result
Adding dynamic CTP to coronary CTA improves CAD detection AUC by ~0.09 over CTA alone.
Why the study?
Single-center studies indicated high diagnostic accuracy of dynamic computed tomography perfusion imaging for CAD, but multicenter data on combined CTA and CTP performance were needed.
Does combined coronary CTA and dynamic CTP improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting hemodynamically significant CAD compared to CTA alone in patients referred for invasive coronary angiography?
Observational (n=157)
Yes
Does combined coronary CTA and dynamic CTP improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting hemodynamically significant CAD compared to CTA alone in patients referred for invasive coronary angiography?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adding dynamic CT perfusion to coronary CTA significantly improves the specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy for detecting hemodynamically significant CAD compared to CTA alone, though at the cost of reduced sensitivity.
Background Single-center studies indicated a high diagnostic accuracy of dynamic computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Objectives This prospective multicenter study determined the diagnostic performance of combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CTP for detecting hemodynamically significant CAD defined by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods Seven centers enrolled 174 patients with suspected or known CAD who were clinically referred for ICA. CTA and dynamic CTP were performed using dual-source CT before ICA. FFR was done as part of ICA in the case of 26% to 90% coronary diameter stenosis. Hemodynamically significant stenosis was defined as FFR of <0.8 or >90% stenosis on ICA. Results The study protocol was completed in 157 participants, and hemodynamically significant stenosis was detected in 76 of 157 patients (48%) and 112 of 442 vessels (25%). According to receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, adding dynamic CTP to CTA significantly increased the area under the curve from 0.65 (95% CI: 0.57-0.72) to 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.81; P = 0.011) on the patient level, with decreased sensitivity (93% vs 72%; P < 0.001), improved specificity (36% vs 75%; P < 0.001), and improved overall accuracy (64% vs 74%; P < 0.001). Conclusions In this prospective multicenter study on dynamic CTP, the combination of anatomic assessment with coronary CTA and functional evaluation with dynamic CTP allowed more accurate identification of hemodynamically significant CAD compared with CTA alone. However, the clinical significance of this approach needs to be further investigated, including its usefulness in improving prognosis. (Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Linked to Infarction and Fibrosis Explored With Dual-Source CT [AMPLIFiED]; UMIN000016353).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitagawa et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=157). Combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and dynamic CTP vs. Coronary CTA alone was evaluated on Detection of hemodynamically significant CAD (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve on the patient level) (95% CI 0.66-0.81, p=0.011). Combined coronary CTA and dynamic CTP significantly increased the area under the curve for detecting hemodynamically significant CAD compared with CTA alone (0.74 vs 0.65; P=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: